>6752 exit(1);
>6753}
>6754my_bind_addr = (ulong)
> ((in_addr*)ent->h_addr_list[0])->s_addr;
>6755 }
>6756 break;
>
>
> > And with other DBs, I can set 'sql.example.com' to resolve to N
> > IPs (N=4 in this example):
> >
> > 10.0.0.10
> > 1
> Hi,
>
> > Thank you very much! I'm willing to help test if you can provide me a diff
> > of your changes.
>
> Well, that was easy. I checked the code, and it turns out that the
> functionality is already there. I just tested it on my laptop (running
> 5.0.13) and it does indeed work.
>
>
> Hi James,
>
> >>> I would like to be able to bind to a host name, rather than
> >>> an IP number. IP numbers come and go, and are beyond the
> >>> control of anyone who doesn't have their own direct allocation.
> >>> But since I own my domain, a host name is more permanent.
> >> Adding this f
> Oh, no. I know about etc/hosts (even Windoze boxes has one). It's just
> normally not available for reference until you bind your socket library to
> at least one socket. Again, it's a cart and horse thing. You see, the
> etc/hosts file counts as a "local" DNS server and the DNS protocol
> re
id I make sense?
Yes, but none of the information was new.
> Shawn Green
> Database Administrator
> Unimin Corporation - Spruce Pine
>
> James Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/27/2006 03:59:14 PM:
>
> > > It doesn't allow to bind to a hostname. According t
iguration
parameter.
>
> On 2/22/06, James Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would like to be able to bind to a host name, rather than
> > an IP number. IP numbers come and go, and are beyond the
> > control of anyone who doesn't have their own dir
I would like to be able to bind to a host name, rather than
an IP number. IP numbers come and go, and are beyond the
control of anyone who doesn't have their own direct allocation.
But since I own my domain, a host name is more permanent.
When the time comes to change IP numbers, I want to just
