Re: mysql 4.0.20 uses just one CPU on Gentoo (now: glibc patches)

the answer I got when I asked a similar question a few weeks ago. HTH, --Pete Egor Egorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ...skipped ... -- == Mike Blazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] == -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http

Re: mysql 4.0.20 uses just one CPU on Gentoo

-- == Mike Blazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] == -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

mysql 4.0.20 uses just one CPU on Gentoo

! -- == Mike Blazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] == -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mysql 4.0.20 uses just one CPU on Gentoo

Mike Blazer wrote: In addition to my previous posting - on this machine I have glibc.2.3.2 which was installed using the Gentoo emerge native installer. Dunno, the mysql manual says a lot about various bugs and patches for glibc (that influence the threads behavior) but it is all up to 2.2.2

Re: replicate-do-table and related

=%.% none of these update the slave's tables. Thanks. -- == Mike Blazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] == - Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php

replicate-do-table and related

! -- == Mike Blazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] == - Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list

memory leak

was growing by ~ 1K per 5 min. Now it is up for about 16 hours: virt: 281928K RAM: 143920K See, something wrong happens, it's back 50% in RAM. It's a memory leak, isn't it? Thanks, any input is much appreciated -- == Mike Blazer [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: memory leak

Oops, sorry, few mistakes here Mike Blazer wrote: Hello guys, I'm runing mysql 4.0.0 under apache and mod_perl on solaris 2.28 - we are in a kinda testing/adjusting period. So, yesterday I've wrote an utility on top of `ps -o vsz,rss -e` to monitor the memory usage by my processes