2005/6/10, Atle Veka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> software has much to do with this, the biggest problem is your disk. :)
>
Don't understimate what a McAfee VirusScan can do on your pc's
performance :-), however, you are probably right.
--
Ciao
Nico
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: ht
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Nico Alberti wrote:
> 2005/6/10, Atle Veka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The speed of the drive will have a lot to say on how long the queries run.
> > You haven't said anything about what type of master you have, OS, mysqld
>
> Thank you all for your answers. As I said before, I w
2005/6/10, Atle Veka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The speed of the drive will have a lot to say on how long the queries run.
> You haven't said anything about what type of master you have, OS, mysqld
Thank you all for your answers. As I said before, I was only curious,
as fortunately I don't have to rel
The speed of the drive will have a lot to say on how long the queries run.
You haven't said anything about what type of master you have, OS, mysqld
version, etc, but I would assume that your server is much much faster
(faster drives, more memory, faster bus, ...).
Are both your mysql daemons confi
Hello.
There's a lot of complains that usually slave is far behind
the master. However, the distance between them usually is not so large.
Could it be that your laptop much is weaker or not that tuned compared to the
server, and the same operation takes more time? As I know replication
thre
Hi everybody.
Is it normal that, after a massive number (300.000) of INSERTs on the
master server (that however did not take more than some minutes), my
laptop that acts as a slave needs hours to catch up? The logfile was
almost instantly transferred, but the INSERTs at the slave server seem
to re
