I don't have any experience with dual core yet (my first dual dual
core box is scheduled to arrive this week!!). I don't think I'd opt
for a dual core in place of 2 single cores. I'm hoping (expecting?) to
see an advantage in 2 DC over 2 SC.
As far as SCSI over SATA goes, I exclusively use SATA. I
Thanks for all the feedback on this.
Is there any received wisdom on whether 1 dual core processor is better than 2
'normal' processors?
Also, is there any advantage to SCSI over SATA?
TIA,
James Harvard
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscr
does it absolutely HAVE to be 1u?
if you can go 2u we've been really happy w/HP DL385s lately. 2u form (which
is still pretty small for a DB server), redundant power supplies (a good
thing for DB server), six drive bays (so you can RAID5 or three mirror
pairs), remote management card and Opteron
It doesn't seem like a mission critical app, but I would seriously
consider using redundant RAID (ie, not 0, but 1 or 5). Nothing ruins
your day quite like losing a non-redundant drive, even if you have
good backups.
Also, what sort of workload are you looking at? How responsive does it
need to be
James Harvard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/12/2005
10:26:42 AM:
> [Apologies for my first post here being semi-off-topic!]
>
> I normally deploys apps I develop (MySQL with Lasso web middleware)
> with an ISP, so I have no experience of choosing hardware
> configurations or sourcing them.
>
[Apologies for my first post here being semi-off-topic!]
I normally deploys apps I develop (MySQL with Lasso web middleware) with an
ISP, so I have no experience of choosing hardware configurations or sourcing
them.
My current client's application involves a very large amount of data which I