On Thursday 20 February 2003 01:04, Jeff Kilbride wrote:
I have one master and two slaves all running 3.23.55-max on RedHat 7.3.
I've had replication up and running smoothly for several days. Today, I
decided to try out LOAD DATA INFILE on the master. After successfully
loading on the master,
selective replication of some tables or databases? If yes,
check also that your LOAD DATA INFILE is not excluded by these rules.
Regards,
Heikki
Innobase Oy
sql query
.
Subject: re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE
From: Egor Egorov
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:07:02 +0200
: Thursday, February 20, 2003 5:32 AM
Subject: re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE
Jeff, Egor,
Guilhem Bichot just found a bug in replication of LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE
in
4.0.
The problem is the LOCAL keyword. Of a large import file, only 8 kB or 16
kB
will actually be replicated
, February 20, 2003 5:32 AM
Subject: re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE
Jeff, Egor,
Guilhem Bichot just found a bug in replication of LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE
in
4.0.
The problem is the LOCAL keyword. Of a large import file, only 8 kB or 16
kB
will actually
of this
problem?
Thanks,
--jeff
- Original Message -
From: Guilhem Bichot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeff Kilbride [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Heikki Tuuri [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE
Hi
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE
Hi
Thanks for your bug report.
In latest 3.23 and 4.0, the slave ignores any LOAD DATA INFILE
as long as one of these options is set on the slave
I have one master and two slaves all running 3.23.55-max on RedHat 7.3. I've
had replication up and running smoothly for several days. Today, I decided
to try out LOAD DATA INFILE on the master. After successfully loading on the
master, I checked both slaves and neither one had the new data. There
