Hello Rick
On 7/16/2012 5:54 PM, Rick James wrote:
Shawn, can you explain why one of the links on that page is broken?
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=14248833
Says
No such bug #14248833 or bug is referenced in the Oracle bug system.
That's the wrong bug system to see that bug. In
OK, I understand. Just seems wrong to have a link visible to the general
public, but the page is inaccessible.
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Green [mailto:shawn.l.gr...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:33 AM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: GA download reverted
, 2012 11:26 AM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: GA download reverted back to 5.5.24?
On 7/1/2012 12:11 AM, Hank wrote:
Check the manual:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/news-5-5-25.html
Shawn Green
Thank you, but that warning note was not there when I first posted
On 7/1/2012 12:11 AM, Hank wrote:
Check the manual:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/news-5-5-25.html
Shawn Green
Thank you, but that warning note was not there when I first posted
this message in here. I'm not sure when the warning note appeared,
but I'd guess it was within the last 36
Am 06.07.2012 04:09, schrieb Noel Butler:
For those interested 5.5.25a has been released overnight, long after oracle
claimed it was there.
2/ to the wanker who said people deserve what they get for untesting on DEV
bed first ...
this is true _IF_ it was a major release. (as I hope we
Charming, Noel. Are you Devops? :-D
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
**
For those interested 5.5.25a has been released overnight, long after
oracle claimed it was there.
frankly., I think they ought to have use 5.5.26.
To those who replied to me
For those interested 5.5.25a has been released overnight, long after
oracle claimed it was there.
frankly., I think they ought to have use 5.5.26.
To those who replied to me directly, a few facts...
1/ it never affected me directly - my gripe with them was on principle
and their actions (or lack
Oracle have been quick to announce new releases of mysql, but failed to issue
a notice saying uhoh, you better not use it instead, putting a small
notice, where, on a fricken manual page FFS. who the hell reads that! and
they say use version a which does not even exist, I'd hate to think
Noel,
I am really sorry for those high profile sites, which in your scenario
haven't tested their database in dev/test/stage before upgrading. Bugs happen.
Big organizations have slower communication.
Cheers,
Mihail
On Jun 30, 2012, at 0:16, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
I
Agreed - if you installed this version in production without fully testing
then it's your problem, you'll need to downgrade. If you've
tested thoroughly and hit the bug then you you're aware of the issue
already and do not have it installed in production. If you tested
thoroughly and didn't hit
Check the manual:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/news-5-5-25.html
Shawn Green
Thank you, but that warning note was not there when I first posted
this message in here. I'm not sure when the warning note appeared,
but I'd guess it was within the last 36 hours. All that I could see
was
On 6/28/2012 9:41 PM, Hank wrote:
I am in the process of reporting a new MySQL bug in 5.5.25 (doesn't
exist in 5.5.24) - see: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=65740
And I just noticed that at the mysql.com website, the GA downloads
have just been reverted back to 5.5.24.
Is there a blog or
That was nice of oracle to announce this wasn't it ...(/sarcasm)
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 16:35 -0400, Shawn Green wrote:
On 6/28/2012 9:41 PM, Hank wrote:
I am in the process of reporting a new MySQL bug in 5.5.25 (doesn't
exist in 5.5.24) - see: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=65740
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 11:34 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
That was nice of oracle to announce this wasn't it ...(/sarcasm)
not to mention source of 25a can not be found anywhere on any mirror I
looked at, or the download page
fucking hopeless
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 16:35 -0400, Shawn
That was nice of oracle to announce this wasn't it ...(/sarcasm)
I am not aligned with any side.. and I am also not known/qualified/respected in
this group enough to make much of a statement... but:
IMHO, In almost all matters, *appreciation* is the only approach that will
serve... let
+1
2012/6/30 Govinda govinda.webdnat...@gmail.com
That was nice of oracle to announce this wasn't it ...(/sarcasm)
I am not aligned with any side.. and I am also not
known/qualified/respected in this group enough to make much of a
statement... but:
IMHO, In almost all matters,
I wonder if you would have the same opinion to say your Operating System
environment, Apache, php, any mainstream server daemon, how about they
pull the current version for a serious bug, but dont tell anyone...
Oracle have been quick to announce new releases of mysql, but failed to
issue a
I am in the process of reporting a new MySQL bug in 5.5.25 (doesn't
exist in 5.5.24) - see: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=65740
And I just noticed that at the mysql.com website, the GA downloads
have just been reverted back to 5.5.24.
Is there a blog or update site that might explain why they
One of those times where you regret staying uptodate :( I do admit i
have encountered never seen before replication delays with my slaves... is
it related ?
Regards
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Hank hes...@gmail.com wrote:
I am in the process of reporting a new MySQL bug in 5.5.25
Hi,
* On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:41:29PM -0400, Hank hes...@gmail.com wrote:
I am in the process of reporting a new MySQL bug in 5.5.25 (doesn't
exist in 5.5.24) - see: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=65740
And I just noticed that at the mysql.com website, the GA downloads
have just been
20 matches
Mail list logo
