Re: Info on 4.0x release date

2002-08-28 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hello. On Wed 2002-08-28 at 17:16:59 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Do you (all) realize you can only complain about this (falling so far > >from their prediction), because they happened to give out some > >estimate in the first place? > > > >Sounds only reasonable to me to try to avoid the

Re: Info on 4.0x release date

2002-08-28 Thread Will French
sql query Benjamin Pflugmann wrote: >Do you (all) realize you can only complain about this (falling so far >from their prediction), because they happened to give out some >estimate in the first place? > >Sounds only reasonable to me to try to avoid the same situation by not >giving out estimatio

Re: Info on 4.0x release date

2002-08-28 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hello. On Wed 2002-08-28 at 09:19:46 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > serious. It becomes harmful to MySQL in general when a release that was > once predicted in 2001, becomes no where in sight in late 2002. Do you (all) realize you can only complain about this (falling so far from their

Re: Info on 4.0x release date

2002-08-28 Thread Gerald Clark
Other companies require you to sign up for a Beta program before you can even look at it. The public doesn't even hear about it until the Beta is through, and the product is ready. You probably will never know how long the Beta cycle lasted. You are privileded to be given such early access to Be

Re: Info on 4.0x release date

2002-08-28 Thread rm
> From: Joel Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Will French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Info on 4.0.x release date > Date: 28 Aug 2002 14:41:51 +0900 > > I know I'm not really involved here, but I would like to suggest a few > things. > > > Obviously you don't agree