Hello,
This question is probably repeated each week, but I am an absolute beginner
with MySQL. Sorry for that. I've installed the precompiled binaries for Win,
and I am very satisfied with MySQL. The only thing I couldn't find is
support for transactions, although it was written in the
Samim,
- Original Message -
From: Samim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:31 AM
Subject: InnoDB, BDB
Hello,
This question is probably repeated each week, but I am an absolute
beginner
with MySQL. Sorry for that. I've installed
Samim,
Monday, April 22, 2002, 11:20:48 AM, you wrote:
S This question is probably repeated each week, but I am an absolute beginner
S with MySQL. Sorry for that. I've installed the precompiled binaries for Win,
S and I am very satisfied with MySQL. The only thing I couldn't find is
S support
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:39:32AM -0700, Eric J. Schwertfeger wrote:
Aside from what's in the manual, I have a little to offer. I just
got InnoDB working yesterday, so take what I have to say with a
grain of salt.
And I'll add a bit, too. :-)
Gemini: Currently in Beta testing, with no
I have re-read the appropriate manual sections several times, trying to
decide what is the best option for my database table types. I am using
3.32.37 on
Linux, and am torn between InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini table types. Transaction
handling is very important for my application (commit, rollback
distribution with regard to BDB, Monty sais they are fix in .38
Kevin McBrearty wrote:
I have re-read the appropriate manual sections several times, trying to
decide what is the best option for my database table types. I am using
3.32.37 on
Linux, and am torn between InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini
: 11 May 2001 06:10
To: Kevin McBrearty; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini
InnoDB definately provides more features that BDB, and is probably
going to be faster, Gemini isn't available yet. BDB might be more
complete/stable.
So I'd say Gemini is out of the picture
Have you noticed a significant speed decline using Gemini tables?
RH
-Original Message-
From: Warren van der Merwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:31 AM
To: 'Steve Ruby'; 'Kevin McBrearty'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini
Goodday to you
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini
Have you noticed a significant speed decline using Gemini tables?
RH
-Original Message-
From: Warren van der Merwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:31 AM
To: 'Steve Ruby'; 'Kevin McBrearty'; [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Kevin McBrearty wrote:
I have re-read the appropriate manual sections several times, trying to
decide what is the best option for my database table types. I am using
3.32.37 on
Linux, and am torn between InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini table types. Transaction
handling is very
I am in the process of building a database/php app that is going to require
transaction support. Which table type should I go with? BerkeleyDB or
Innobase?? It looks like the InnoDB has some neat features like row-level
locking, etc. but is it stable enough for a production system, or should it
11 matches
Mail list logo
