On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 13:02 +0700, Ady Wicaksono wrote:
> On 10/9/06, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 11:42 +0700, Ady Wicaksono wrote:
> > > Is your MSSQL data structure contain such foreign key?
> > >
> > > If yes, my isam is not suitable for you
> >
> > Actually,
On 10/9/06, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 11:42 +0700, Ady Wicaksono wrote:
> Is your MSSQL data structure contain such foreign key?
>
> If yes, my isam is not suitable for you
Actually, you know what? I don't really know.
How does one go about checking?
Dump it
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 11:42 +0700, Ady Wicaksono wrote:
> Is your MSSQL data structure contain such foreign key?
>
> If yes, my isam is not suitable for you
Actually, you know what? I don't really know.
How does one go about checking?
>
> Others... for overall, i prefer innodb :)
I know it's t
Is your MSSQL data structure contain such foreign key?
If yes, my isam is not suitable for you
Others... for overall, i prefer innodb :)
On 10/8/06, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm just curious as to which would have better performance for my needs.
backend is a MSSQL server and I
I'm just curious as to which would have better performance for my needs.
backend is a MSSQL server and I want to replicate it into a MySQL
Frontend for user accesses.
replication would be done via "mysqlimport/load data infile". I'm
thinking of doing the inserts something like ever 5 seconds or s
5, 2003 2:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Large file : InnoDB or MyISAM
>
>
> Hi to all,
>
> I will have to do with a very big file (approx 600 millions
> of records).
> Which is the best table handler for this king of table :
> InnoDB or MyISAM
&g
Hi to all,
I will have to do with a very big file (approx 600 millions of records).
Which is the best table handler for this king of table : InnoDB or MyISAM
(many INSERT and MANY SELECT, no UPDATE - statistics file).
Best regards.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http
Hello! :)
I'm wondering which table type is better and why for
web project with about 100 000 customers. May be
InnoDB gives better query performance? I'm using now
MyIsam, but is this better idea to move to InnoDB?
Thank you! :)
__
Do You Yahoo
At 06:28 AM 7/5/2002, you wrote:
>Hello! :)
>
>I'm wondering which table type is better and why for
>web project with about 100 000 customers. May be
>InnoDB gives better query performance? I'm using now
>MyIsam, but is this better idea to move to InnoDB?
>
>Thank you! :)
In addition to Steve's c
2002 7:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: InnoDB or MyIsam?
Hello! :)
I'm wondering which table type is better and why for
web project with about 100 000 customers. May be
InnoDB gives better query performance? I'm using now
MyIsam, but is this better idea to move to
10 matches
Mail list logo