Petre,
- Original Message -
From: "Petre Agenbag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: MAX vs plain vanilla mysql
> Thanks,
>
> So, just to be 100% sure, the BEST to do is to install max, as
Thanks,
So, just to be 100% sure, the BEST to do is to install max, as I can't
see any reason why NOT to...? No performance issues when used as a plain
vanilla model, no stability and no security issues either, only "down"
side to it is that it is a tad bit larger ?
PS,
Oh, and why do I alway
At 19:31 +0200 7/2/02, Petre Agenbag wrote:
>Thanks,
>So, if you install MySQL MAX, you can use either myisam OR innodb /
>bdb tables, ie, if I install ONE mysql max server, then different
>users on the server can use different types of tables(innodb/myisam)
>as they choose?, also, if you creat
Thanks,
So, if you install MySQL MAX, you can use either myisam OR innodb / bdb
tables, ie, if I install ONE mysql max server, then different users on
the server can use different types of tables(innodb/myisam) as they
choose?, also, if you create one db, can you have different types of
tables
Hi!
I have to correct: if you put
[mysqld]
skip-innodb
skip-bdb
to your my.cnf, then -Max uses only about 1.5 MB more memory than plain
MySQL, because of a larger executable.
MyISAM tables in -Max are as reliable as in plain MySQL. It is the same
source code.
Best regards,
Heikki
Innobase Oy
Petre,
Monday, July 01, 2002, 9:26:49 AM, you wrote:
PA> Probably a stupid question, but which is best to have on ones server,
PA> the "old" mysql, or max. I.O.W, if you install MAX and never use innodb
PA> or berkeley tables, will it be equivalent to a normal mysql installation
PA> wrt perform
Hi
Probably a stupid question, but which is best to have on ones server,
the "old" mysql, or max. I.O.W, if you install MAX and never use innodb
or berkeley tables, will it be equivalent to a normal mysql installation
wrt performance and stability?
I'm asking from an ISP's point of view, if tha
