Barry Blatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a system here based on Red Hat's 7.2 distribution and I am wanting to
> get MySQL up and running. After browsing your web page it seems that I will
> have go to a different version of gcc.
Not recommended, the most stable gcc-based compiler aro
Barry,
Monday, April 08, 2002, 8:33:02 PM, you wrote:
BB> I have a system here based on Red Hat's 7.2 distribution and I am wanting to
BB> get MySQL up and running. After browsing your web page it seems that I will
BB> have go to a different version of gcc. Would I be safe to go to the latest
B
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:33:02AM -0600, Barry Blatz wrote:
>
> I have a system here based on Red Hat's 7.2 distribution and I am
> wanting to get MySQL up and running. After browsing your web page
> it seems that I will have go to a different version of gcc. Would I
> be safe to go to the late
I have a system here based on Red Hat's 7.2 distribution and I am wanting to
get MySQL up and running. After browsing your web page it seems that I will
have go to a different version of gcc. Would I be safe to go to the latest
version (3.0.4) of gcc?
Barry Blatz
Pason Systems Corp.
(403) 301-3
>
> I just checked out sun-freeware and they have recently released gcc 3.0.2.
> I am downloading this now and as soon as I get some time over I will
> see if this can be used to generate 64 bit binaries.
I just checked on this. The gcc package from sun-freeware was not built
with 64bit support
Hi!
> "Greg" == Greg Cope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Greg> We use the Sun's cc complier - this is the standard complier here on Spark /
Greg> Solaris.
The problem is that we don't have access to a system to a Solaris 8 system
with SUN cc installed.
(If anyone want to make one available
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 05:05:54PM +0200, Michael Widenius wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>
> Yes; Our Solaris binaries are currently 32 bit.
>
> The main reason for this is that I haven't seen any reports that gcc
> should be able to produce production quality code on 64 bit sparc.
>
the sun compiler d
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Widenius
> Yes; Our Solaris binaries are currently 32 bit.
>
Hi,
> The main reason for this is that I haven't seen any reports that gcc
> should be able to produce production quality code on 64 bit sparc.
>
I've been involved with 64bity stuff h
Ian writes:
> Here is the 2.8 package I just downloaded from one of your mirror sites.
>
> [reckon]/vol0/homes/ian/tmp/mysql-3.23.46-sun-solaris2.8-sparc/bin> ls mysqld
> mysqld*
> [reckon]/vol0/homes/ian/tmp/mysql-3.23.46-sun-solaris2.8-sparc/bin> file mysqld
> mysqld: ELF 32-bit MSB exe
Here is the 2.8 package I just downloaded from one of your mirror sites.
[reckon]/vol0/homes/ian/tmp/mysql-3.23.46-sun-solaris2.8-sparc/bin> ls mysqld
mysqld*
[reckon]/vol0/homes/ian/tmp/mysql-3.23.46-sun-solaris2.8-sparc/bin> file mysqld
mysqld: ELF 32-bit MSB executable SPARC Version 1,
> -Original Message-
> From: Sinisa Milivojevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 December 2001 12:47
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 64bit mysql and gcc
>
>
> PFIZER GLOB
Ian writes:
> I would be more than happy to. Could you point me in the direction
> of the binaries? The ones that I have found have been 32bit DBs.
>
> IW.
>
>
>
What makes you think that our Solaris 2.8 binaries are 32bit ??
--
Regards,
__ ___ ___ __
/ |/ /_ __/ _
I would be more than happy to. Could you point me in the direction
of the binaries? The ones that I have found have been 32bit DBs.
IW.
On Dec 3 Sinisa Milivojevic was rumored to have written:
>
> GCC 3.* is not fully tested on Solaris.
>
> Why don't you just use our binaries. They
Ian writes:
> Greetings,
>
> I am having some trouble getting a 64bit mysql (built with gcc)
> to work correctly. I am able to build and start mysql, but it crashes
> anytime I try to manipulate a table with some data in it. This is
> using mysql-3.23.42.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
> I
Greetings,
I am having some trouble getting a 64bit mysql (built with gcc)
to work correctly. I am able to build and start mysql, but it crashes
anytime I try to manipulate a table with some data in it. This is
using mysql-3.23.42.
Here is what I see in the error log.
011130 18:53:35 mysqld r
Date |Sun, 15 Jul 2001 21:14:43 +0200
>From |Alexandre BAUMEISTER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello!
>>> Do someone see improvements compiling Mysql with Gcc 3.0 ?
SM>> What improvements would you like to see in the compiled library ??
AB> In fact I just wanted to know if there is any advantage to
Alexandre BAUMEISTER writes:
>
> In fact I just wanted to know if there is any advantage to use Gcc
> 3.0 for compiling Mysql.
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
I truly do not know, but judging by 3.0 docs, it should be faster, due
to the faster STL.
--
Regards,
__ ___ ___ __
>> Do someone see improvements compiling Mysql with Gcc 3.0 ?
SM> What improvements would you like to see in the compiled library ??
In fact I just wanted to know if there is any advantage to use Gcc
3.0 for compiling Mysql.
Regards,
Alex.
-
BAUMEISTER Alexandre writes:
> Do someone see improvements compiling Mysql with Gcc 3.0 ?
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
Don't ask me. I do not have time to install 3.0 on my machine.
What improvements would you like to see in the compiled library ??
--
Regards,
__ ___ ___ __
SM> I am sending a patch straight to you
Do someone see improvements compiling Mysql with Gcc 3.0 ?
Regards,
Alex.
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.my
I am sending a patch straight to you
--
Regards,
__ ___ ___ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Mr. Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ MySQL AB, FullTime Developer
/_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ Larnaca, Cyprus
<___/ www.mysql.com
--
RH 7.1
GCC 3.0
Did someone say there was a patch for this?
[mike@hanna mysql++-1.7.9]$ make
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/mike/mysql++-1.7.9'
Making all in sqlplusint
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/mike/mysql++-1.7.9/sqlplusint'
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile c
22 matches
Mail list logo
