On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 03:54, Robert Sundström wrote:
queries, with medium sized transactions (3-5 statements per transaction,
where transactions was supported). On my regular desktop box I was able to
get about 700 statements per second using MyISAM and about two thirds of
that using
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 12:54:33PM +0100, Robert Sundström wrote:
I have done some admittedly not-so-scientific testing on MySQL (both
with MyISAM and InnoDB) to find that both combinations performs best
in single user systems.
That shouldn't surprise anyone. There little if any contention
At 04:23 2001-12-02 , you wrote:
Not sure that total users is a good metric; queries per second may be
better.
We host web sites and use MySQL with MyISAM tables for small and
medium-sized sites, Oracle for the big ones. Oracle's row-level locking
abilities make a big, deciding difference for
!
-Original Message-
From: Robert Sundstrvm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quinta-feira, 13 de Dezembro de 2001 11:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MySQL v.s. Oracle
At 04:23 2001-12-02 , you wrote:
Not sure that total users is a good metric; queries per second may be
better.
We host web sites
Robert Sundström writes:
Most stable commercial products exposes the opposite behavior. It may be
the case that MySQL performs pretty well in single (or few) user cases, but
the commercial alternatives will, in my experience, in most cases beat
MySQL on 3-5 users and above.
Only few
Robert,
-Original Message-
From: Robert Sundstrvm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: quinta-feira, 13 de Dezembro de 2001 11:55To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: MySQL v.s. Oracle
At 04:23 2001-12-02 , you wrote:
Not sure that total users is a good metric; queries per second may bebetter
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:59 PM
To: MySQL Mailing List
Subject: MySQL v.s. Oracle
Hi all,
We are currently using MySQL for our database driven website. Currently,
we have about 100,000 users. In January, we will be getting 2 million
new registered users on our website.
We're
Hi!
Look at the InnoDB/MySQL user stories at http://www.innodb.com
1200 queries per second on a single processor Intel box is easy to attain. A
terabyte of data is handled at an InnoDB/MySQL site.
InnoDB is close to Oracle in architecture.
Regards,
Heikki
http://www.innodb.com
--
Order
We are currently using MySQL for our database driven website. Currently,
we have about 100,000 users. In January, we will be getting 2 million
new registered users on our website.
Yes, but how many hits are you expecting, and what sort of queries will be
ran?
We're buying a $50,000 Sun box
be using'em in place of Oracle
for most sites.
Thanks,
--Walt Weaver
Bozeman, Montana
-Original Message-
From: Philip Mak
To: MySQL Mailing List
Sent: 11/30/2001 8:59 PM
Subject: MySQL v.s. Oracle
Hi all,
We are currently using MySQL for our database driven website. Currently,
we have about
10 matches
Mail list logo
