: John Dean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 9:24 AM
To: Steve Ruby; Cal Evans
Cc: Gary Huntress; Mysql (E-mail)
Subject: Re: No Stored Procedures - Big Deal
Hi
Agreed but it still incurrs a performance penulty; more so when the server
is
under heavy load
On Friday 30 March
t; http://www.calevans.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: John Dean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 7:50 AM
> > To: Gary Huntress; Mysql (E-mail)
> > Subject: Re: No Stored Procedures - Big Deal
> >
> > Hi
> &g
http://www.calevans.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Dean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 7:50 AM
> To: Gary Huntress; Mysql (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: No Stored Procedures - Big Deal
>
> Hi
> I must agree with you on this point, a
John Dean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 7:50 AM
To: Gary Huntress; Mysql (E-mail)
Subject: Re: No Stored Procedures - Big Deal
Hi
I must agree with you on this point, after what can be done in a stored
procedure can also be done with SQL. The only real advantage I can s
Hi
I must agree with you on this point, after what can be done in a stored
procedure can also be done with SQL. The only real advantage I can see to
provide a centralized store of commonly used SQL, but then again these can be
stored in a text file. The disadvantage is a down grade in performan
I don't mean to be argumentative, but what is everyones love affair with stored
procedures? I like putting my logic in the mid-tier and I'm constantly battling my
Sybase Admin at work who maligns me whenever they spot a query in my codeeven a
very simple select "oh, I can make that a store
