Re: RE: Platform vs. Performance

2003-09-19 Thread Jeremy Proffitt
First, Thanks for all replies, I'll be going with XP Pro on a P4 machine. The next question is RAM, I know more is better, but the access database file I'm using now is 120Megs and will stay about the same size. Do I need more than 1G, can I get by with 512M Ram? I will of course turn

RE: RE: Platform vs. Performance

2003-09-19 Thread Dan Bowkley
, ram is cheap enough you can really load up a machine and not hurt too much. D -Original Message- From: Jeremy Proffitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 8:46 PM To: Mysql List Subject: Re: RE: Platform vs. Performance First, Thanks for all replies, I'll be going

RE: Platform vs. Performance

2003-09-18 Thread Andy Eastham
- From: Jeremy Proffitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 September 2003 23:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Platform vs. Performance We are currently using an access database going through an odbc connection in vb.net for our application (which is still in development). The plan

RE: Platform vs. Performance

2003-09-18 Thread Greg_Cope
Pros? Cons? I know the windows box would need a good reboot now and then and what is the performance hit on a WinTel 98/XP Pro platform vs Linux? Looking at a 40K record database with maybe 3 users at a time running 5-10 Large (length of the select statment is over 500 characters

RE: Platform vs. Performance

2003-09-18 Thread Andy Eastham
I don't see anything in there that is relevant to the original posting. Andy -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Harald Fuchs Sent: 18 September 2003 14:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Platform vs. Performance In article [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Platform vs. Performance

2003-09-18 Thread Alec . Cawley
I don't see anything in there that is relevant to the original posting. The tables headed Speed difference between different SQL servers (times in seconds) The top row of each table shows times for the same operation on Linux and Windows, showing that for both operations tested, Linux

RE: Platform vs. Performance

2003-09-18 Thread Andy Eastham
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 September 2003 14:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Mysql List Subject: RE: Platform vs. Performance I don't see anything in there that is relevant to the original posting. The tables headed Speed difference between different

Re: Platform vs. Performance

2003-09-18 Thread Chris Nolan
Are these numbers still valid? Those documents are quite old - well before the time of 4.0 being declared production ready and before the inclusion of InnoDB tables. Since then, the Windows port has had a lot of work done on it and many of the TODO sections at the bottom have been taken care of.

RE: Platform vs. Performance

2003-09-18 Thread Andy Eastham
of reality... Andy -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Harald Fuchs Sent: 18 September 2003 17:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Platform vs. Performance In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andy Eastham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't see anything

Platform vs. Performance

2003-09-17 Thread Jeremy Proffitt
We are currently using an access database going through an odbc connection in vb.net for our application (which is still in development). The plan was to use MySQL in the end and we are needing to cross that bridge. I was wondering the Performance differences between running MySQL on a Linux