Re: Poor Manual [Was: Why using filesort here?]

2002-04-21 Thread Georg Richter
On Sunday, 21. April 2002 20:54, Colin Faber wrote: > it's my understanding that the latest revision of the manual is (minus > 4.x commits) always included in the distribution set. New features > are always documented in the manual and are nearly always appended > with a "This was added in versio

Re: Poor Manual [Was: Why using filesort here?]

2002-04-21 Thread Colin Faber
Hi benjamin/Sven, it's my understanding that the latest revision of the manual is (minus 4.x commits) always included in the distribution set. New features are always documented in the manual and are nearly always appended with a "This was added in version " string some place. Benjamin Pflugm

Re: Poor Manual [Was: Why using filesort here?]

2002-04-21 Thread Benjamin Pflugmann
Hello. On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:15:33PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > > I assume you are referring to the online manual? It's documenting the > > most recent version. According to the change history (Appendix D), > > this optimization was introduced in version 4.0.2. > > I see, thank

Re: Poor Manual

2002-04-21 Thread Sven Huster
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:44:32PM +0200, Roger Baklund wrote: > * Sven Huster > > > > This manual is f@#$% up, since it seems like there is no manual for > > stable versions online or at least some annotations that say in which > > version a feature was introduced (it's not nice to lookup every c

Poor Manual [Was: Why using filesort here?]

2002-04-21 Thread Sven Huster
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 05:16:46AM +0200, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote: > Hi. > > [...] > > According to the MySQL doc (5.2.7, example 5) this should work > > using the index without any additional sorting. > > > > MySQL-3.23.49-max-log running on FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE > > I assume you are referring