On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:36:46PM +0100, Seun Osewa wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Hmmm ... I guess the meat of my suggestion is that it be made
> available on a per-transaction basis because in many applications
> some transactions are more "critical" than others. So even on
> systems where there are
- Original message ---
From: Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:17:04 -0700
Subject: Re: Possible Commit Syntax Change for Improved TPS
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:19:19PM +0100, Oluwaseun Osewa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been studying the basic limi
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:19:19PM +0100, Oluwaseun Osewa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been studying the basic limitation that the number of
> committed transactions per second possible in a relational databases
> is limited by the number of writed per second of the underlying hard
> disk, since ea
Hi,
I have been studying the basic limitation that the number of
committed transactions per second possible in a relational databases
is limited by the number of writed per second of the underlying hard
disk, since each transaction requires at least the write-ahead log data
to be flushed to di
