On Aug 11, 2004, at 11:45, Santino wrote:
I think that the license scheme is very simple reading gnu faq:
If you distribute your software under GPL you and your customer don't
need a commercial license but the user can change your code and give
it away with a GPL license.
In every other case you
On Aug 11, 2004, at 7:09, Leonardo Francalanci wrote:
If you develop a product, say, some kind of online shopping
system that you
distribute on a CD which installs Linux, Apache, MysQL, PHP and
your App and
distribute that, then you probably should be paying for a license.
This is
because instead
I think that the license scheme is very simple reading gnu faq:
If you distribute your software under GPL you and your customer don't
need a commercial license but the user can change your code and give
it away with a GPL license.
In every other case you need a commercial license.
The point of GP
11 August 2004 10:11 PM
To: Leonardo Francalanci
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: R: On the licensing once again
LF> What if I sell a web site built using mysql?
LF> Do I need a license on my web server?
The conclusion i have made is that from end-user point of view his
mySQL is runnin
LF> What if I sell a web site built using mysql?
LF> Do I need a license on my web server?
The conclusion i have made is that from end-user point of view his
mySQL is running under multiple licencies simultaniously depending on
what 3rd parties software makes request to it. To be more precise at a
