Re: slave to master

2016-04-30 Thread william drescher
On 4/30/2016 3:22 AM, Thomas wrote: Am Freitag, 29. April 2016, 14:49:57 schrieb william drescher: On 4/28/2016 5:20 PM, Thomas wrote: Hi, I have setup an master slave replication. This works fine. I have running an Apache webserver and some other programms accessing the master. Whats the stan

Re: slave to master

2016-04-30 Thread Thomas
Am Freitag, 29. April 2016, 14:49:57 schrieb william drescher: > On 4/28/2016 5:20 PM, Thomas wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have setup an master slave replication. > > This works fine. > > I have running an Apache webserver and some other programms accessing the > > master. > > Whats the standard poced

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.04.2016 um 20:49 schrieb william drescher: On 4/28/2016 5:20 PM, Thomas wrote: Hi, I have setup an master slave replication. This works fine. I have running an Apache webserver and some other programms accessing the master. Whats the standard pocedure if master fail? I want to start up

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread Reindl Harald
ge.net <mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net>>> wrote: Am 29.04.2016 um 15:07 schrieb Johan De Meersman: From: "Mahmoud Alshinhab" mailto:mahmoud.alshin...@gmail.com> <m

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread Mahmoud Alshinhab
>> >> It was actually built for Amazon's Aurora, but it should work >> with any mysql-compatible protoco. >> >> -- >> Eng. Mahmoud Alshinhab >> AWS Cloud Support Engineer >> Fedora Ambassador >> Wik

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread william drescher
On 4/28/2016 5:20 PM, Thomas wrote: Hi, I have setup an master slave replication. This works fine. I have running an Apache webserver and some other programms accessing the master. Whats the standard pocedure if master fail? I want to start up the programms on the slave by hand and then they ar

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread Reindl Harald
From: "Mahmoud Alshinhab" mailto:mahmoud.alshin...@gmail.com>> Subject: Re: slave to master I think you should have a look at MariaDB Connector[1]. It provides Load balancing and failover as Fail

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread Mahmoud Alshinhab
pport Engineer >> Fedora Ambassador >> Wiki : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tuxawy >> mahmoud.alshin...@gmail.com >> tux...@fedoraproject.org >> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Am 29.04.20

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.04.2016 um 17:20 schrieb Mahmoud Alshinhab: Master/slave connection selection It’s the application that has to decide to use master or slave connection (the master connection is set by default). Switching the type of connection is done by using JDBC connection.setReadOnly(boolean readOnl

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread Mahmoud Alshinhab
>> Am 29.04.2016 um 15:07 schrieb Johan De Meersman: >> >>> From: "Mahmoud Alshinhab" >>>> Subject: Re: slave to master >>>> >>> >>> I think you should have a look at MariaDB Connector[1]. >>>> >>> >>

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread Mahmoud Alshinhab
at 3:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 29.04.2016 um 15:07 schrieb Johan De Meersman: > >> From: "Mahmoud Alshinhab" >>> Subject: Re: slave to master >>> >> >> I think you should have a look at MariaDB Connector[1]. >>> &g

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.04.2016 um 15:07 schrieb Johan De Meersman: From: "Mahmoud Alshinhab" Subject: Re: slave to master I think you should have a look at MariaDB Connector[1]. It provides Load balancing and failover as Failover occurs when a connection to a primary database server fai

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread Johan De Meersman
> From: "Mahmoud Alshinhab" > Subject: Re: slave to master > I think you should have a look at MariaDB Connector[1]. > It provides Load balancing and failover as Failover occurs when a connection > to > a primary database server fails and the connector will open

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread Mahmoud Alshinhab
> From: "Jason Mallory" > > Subject: RE: slave to master > > > > Master-master with load balancer would be best > > That's a bit brief, isn't it? :-) > > It's more than worth pointing out that your loadbalancer should not > actually be loadb

Re: slave to master

2016-04-29 Thread Johan De Meersman
- Original Message - > From: "Jason Mallory" > Subject: RE: slave to master > > Master-master with load balancer would be best That's a bit brief, isn't it? :-) It's more than worth pointing out that your loadbalancer should not actually be loadbal

RE: slave to master

2016-04-28 Thread Jason Mallory
Master-master with load balancer would be best Jason Mallory, MySQL/SQL Server DBA p: +1.480.752.1198 | m: +1.480.823.7771 | f: +1. 480.752.1105  |  www.iridium.com The information contained in this email is strictly conf

Re: Slave to Master Connection

2001-04-08 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 10:37:36AM +0530, MCA Department PESIT wrote: > the error that i specifically get when the slave tries to connect to > the master is > > 010409 10:44:58 Slave thread: error connecting to master:Can't connect to > MySQL > server on '192.168.1.2' (111)(107), retry