I highly recommend simply using ext3 for your Linux
setup. The 1 or 2 percent performance benefit that
you may get from raw partitions is way outweighed by
complexness of backups of the raw data.
either way:
First I would suggest you read the Linux RAID howto:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-
On 14 May 2004, at 1:14 am, Dathan Vance Pattishall wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:03 PM
To: Dathan Vance Pattishall
Cc: 'Tim Cutts'; 'MySQL List'
Subject: Re: InnoDB filesystem
On Thu, May 13
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:40:37PM +1000, Chris Nolan wrote:
> Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
>
> >
> >I think that the problem is that it's *not* a 64 bit OS. It's just an
> >Intel 32bit box with > 4GB of memory. And sine MySQL doesn't do PAE,
> >it'll never see that extra memory.
> >
>
> Didn't InnoD
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 04:51:27PM -0700, Dathan Vance Pattishall wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tim Cutts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 7:11 AM
To: MySQL List
Subject: Re: InnoDB filesystem
On 13 May 2004, at 3:34 pm, Dan Nelson wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:03 PM
> To: Dathan Vance Pattishall
> Cc: 'Tim Cutts'; 'MySQL List'
> Subject: Re: InnoDB filesystem
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 04:
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 04:51:27PM -0700, Dathan Vance Pattishall wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Cutts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 7:11 AM
> > To: MySQL List
> > Subject: Re: InnoDB filesystem
> >
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Cutts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 7:11 AM
> To: MySQL List
> Subject: Re: InnoDB filesystem
>
>
> On 13 May 2004, at 3:34 pm, Dan Nelson wrote:
>
> >>> Pros: performance and bypassing
On 13 May 2004, at 3:34 pm, Dan Nelson wrote:
Pros: performance and bypassing the filesystem cache.
I believe most OSes support direct file access which either bypasses or
minimizes cache effects, and InnoDB will enable it if possible.
Solaris direct file I/O performance on UFS is within a couple
In the last episode (May 13), JFL said:
> >>I've been told that InnoDB on a raw partition is the fastest setup.
> >
> >Actually, you've been told that it's probably the fastest.
>
> Correct. Sorry :)
>
> >Check the InnoDB docs. They explain how to setup raw disk
> >partitions. You'll be using d
I've been told that InnoDB on a raw partition is the fastest setup.
Actually, you've been told that it's probably the fastest.
Correct. Sorry :)
Check the InnoDB docs. They explain how to setup raw disk
partitions. You'll be using device names, not mount points.
Thanks. I forgot to check the man
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 11:00:17AM +0200, JFL wrote:
> I've been told that InnoDB on a raw partition is the fastest setup.
Actually, you've been told that it's probably the fastest.
> To setup my system for this, could I create a partition called /innodb
> and adjust the my.cnf like this?
>
> i
11 matches
Mail list logo
