re: MySQL 3.23.49 Merger table

2002-12-02 Thread Victoria Reznichenko
Kittiphum, Saturday, November 30, 2002, 2:09:00 AM, you wrote: KW> Why merge table have been done with table that have column char type KW> not varchar type. KW> Have anyone succesfully with varchar type merge table and how to do KW> that. KW> And how to use union query if merge table not work

RE: MySQL 3.23.49 - strange replication error

2002-11-26 Thread Liz Carroll
It only happened the once, I've checked the history and no one executed any odd commands (that I noticed:-) Thanks Liz -Original Message- From: Egor Egorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 November 2002 15:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: re: MySQL 3.23.49 - strange replication

re: MySQL 3.23.49 - strange replication error

2002-11-26 Thread Egor Egorov
Liz, Monday, November 25, 2002, 6:47:35 PM, you wrote: LC> I've got a master database with 2 slaves. I've had them up and running for LC> quite a while now with no problems, but today I noticed an error - there was LC> a slave running on the master! LC> I checked /etc/my.cnf - no mention of slav

Re: MySQL 3.23.49

2002-10-12 Thread Chris Stoughton
We found the same thing, after installing the glibc auto-rpm from Redhat. The updated glibc packages from Red Hat will whack your /etc/nsswitch.conf file. That is, it will mess with the order of how things are searched for. We noticed this with mysql not being able resolve remote server IPs.

Re: mysql 3.23.49 code

2002-07-31 Thread Egor Egorov
Pushkar, Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 7:00:19 AM, you wrote: PP> I'm using 3.23.49, and trying to load the menagerie database (online PP> examples) by executing the example: PP> LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE 'pet.txt' INTO TABLE pet; PP> This is the error I get: PP> ERROR 1148: The used command is not allo

Re: MySQL 3.23.49 and HP-UX 10.20 Install

2002-04-19 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! > "Michael" == Michael Stassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> This has come up before. In fact, I had the exact same problem. You can Michael> see the the thread "Coredump when running scripts/mysql_install_db " at Michael> http://lists.mysql.com/cgi-ez/ezmlm-cgi?1:msp:93051

Re: MySQL 3.23.49 and HP-UX 10.20 Install

2002-04-08 Thread Michael Stassen
This has come up before. In fact, I had the exact same problem. You can see the the thread "Coredump when running scripts/mysql_install_db " at http://lists.mysql.com/cgi-ez/ezmlm-cgi?1:msp:93051 The conclusion is in "Problem with setrlimit on HPUX 10.20" at http://lists.mysql.com/cgi-ez

Re: mysql 3.23.49-1.src.rpm and RPM 4.0.2 on RH 6.2

2002-03-08 Thread Gabriele Carioli
> I want rebuild source rpm: MySQL-3.23.49-1.src.rpm with rpm 4.0.2 > But it fails. You need the rpm-build-4.0.2-6x.i386.rpm package to use the --rebuild option. You need gcc >= 2.95 to build MySQL (look at the "Why v3.23.49 does not build on RedHat 6.2 ?" thread)

Re: mysql 3.23.49-1 rpm fails with redhat 7 thu 7.2

2002-02-25 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The latest rpms for mysql 3.23.49 produce a signal 4 error when > attempting to run the installed mysql server. > on all our servers running redhat 7 thru 7.2. > > Obviously this can't be a kernel 2.2.x issue, since 7.2 is on 2.4.x. > > I've tried multiple installs

Re: mysql 3.23.49-1 rpm fails with redhat 7 thu 7.2

2002-02-23 Thread Doug Thompson
This matter was addressed this morning by Sasha Pachev in "3.23.49 Linux binary issues" To paraphrase Yogi Berra, you can learn an awful lot just by reading; in this case postings to the list in general from the development team. det On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 08:22:15 -0500, S. William Schulz wrot

Re: mysql 3.23.49-1 rpm fails with redhat 7 thu 7.2

2002-02-23 Thread S. William Schulz
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 01:32:11PM +1300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > The latest rpms for mysql 3.23.49 produce a signal 4 error when > attempting to run the installed mysql server. > on all our servers running redhat 7 thru 7.2. > > Obviously this can't be a kernel 2.2.x issue, sinc

Re: mysql 3.23.49 porting problem on POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts

2002-02-23 Thread Sinisa Milivojevic
Paul Eggert writes: > >Description: > The new POSIX standard is now official (IEEE Std 1003.1-2001), > and it has removed support for some obsolete utility options > that mysql uses in a few places. Basically, the new POSIX > has removed digit-string options (e.g., "tail -

RE: mysql 3.23.49-1 rpm fails with redhat 7 thu 7.2

2002-02-22 Thread Matthew Walker
Hmmm. Wonder if this would be why MySQL-Max failed to install on my new Penguin Computing server... It's running RH7.1 Matthew Walker Ecommerce Project Manager Mountain Top Herbs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 5:32