Just noticed that you said partitions. I am assuming that you meat
multiple drives in a raid array.
Bill
David Lazo said:
> Thanx again.
>
> For the time being, we will keep 4 drives with Dan's suggestion. OS and
> MySQL running from there.
>
>
>
> On 8/25/06 11:03 AM, "Dan Buettner" <[EMAIL PR
Thanx again.
For the time being, we will keep 4 drives with Dan's suggestion. OS and
MySQL running from there.
On 8/25/06 11:03 AM, "Dan Buettner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James, with just 4 drives, you can set up one big RAID 10 disk
> (usually called a "logical disk", with Dell PERCs I
Sorry, I think I had James and David backwards there!
On 8/25/06, Dan Buettner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James, with just 4 drives, you can set up one big RAID 10 disk
(usually called a "logical disk", with Dell PERCs I think it's a
"container"), and then partition it for your different needs.
James, with just 4 drives, you can set up one big RAID 10 disk
(usually called a "logical disk", with Dell PERCs I think it's a
"container"), and then partition it for your different needs.
If you have 4 73 GB disks, you probably have around 135 GB formatted
capacity with RAID 10; I'd do somethin
David Lazo wrote:
I'm sorry to bother you again with this.
So we have the server but we have 4 Drives and now that I'm trying to set up
the RAID10 I'm starting to think I needed 5 Drives one for the OS?.
Please advise.
David.
We built one pretty close to this recently. You definitely
Thanks for all the recommendations.
On 8/22/06 1:11 PM, "Dan Buettner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I second what James recommends re: spindles and RAID 10. Better than
> RAID 5 for live data in my opinion; RAID 5 is decent for archival
> storage.
>
> You've got a pretty decent setup there oth
I second what James recommends re: spindles and RAID 10. Better than
RAID 5 for live data in my opinion; RAID 5 is decent for archival
storage.
You've got a pretty decent setup there otherwise - 4 CPU cores, 8 GB
RAM - and you want to make sure your disks can keep things fed.
As far as splittin
David Lazo wrote:
We want to get:
Windows Server 2003 R2, Standard x64 Edition
2- Dual Core Intel Xeon 5080, 2x2MB Cache, 3.73GHz, 1066MHz FSB
8GB 533MHz (8x1GB), Dual Ranked DIMMs
3- 146GB, SAS, 3.5-inch, 15K RPM Hard Drives
What would be the recommended RAID configuration settings for a dedic
