Keith C. Ivey wrote:
>MySQL AB appears to be in the midst of changing the names for the
>various versions, and the information on the various pages doesn't
>seem to be consistent yet.
>
>
I had replied to the original as well (and it got spam filtered for not
containing "SQL"!), but I'll say
On 2 Oct 2002, at 16:50, Matt Hargraves wrote:
> Yes, I should apologize... no offense intended... I hate RTFM responses
> myself. I just thought that maybe he could have done a little more research
> before asking the question. It was kinda like asking what the features of
> InnoDB were, when
what
you wanted.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Keith C. Ivey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: pro vs max
> Perhaps those posting obnoxious RTFM responses to Scott's question
> s
Perhaps those posting obnoxious RTFM responses to Scott's question
should actually take a look at the "Versions" box at the side of the
MySQL front page and see that there's no longer any mention of MySQL
Classic. Where previously there was a choice between MySQL Classic
and MySQL Pro (replac
Matt Hargraves wrote:
>Neat thing on the MySQL front page... it's called news. It lists that there
>are new 'price points' (versions) for people. The only differnce between
>MySQL Classic and MySQL Pro is Innodb, IIRC.
>
>
If I may be so bold as to point out that the description for the
diff
Scott,
- Original Message -
From: ""Hathaway, Scott L"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:56 PM
Subject: pro vs max
> I went to the download site to get 4.04. I noticed that there is a pro
> version now. What is the difference b
Neat thing on the MySQL front page... it's called news. It lists that there
are new 'price points' (versions) for people. The only differnce between
MySQL Classic and MySQL Pro is Innodb, IIRC.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Hathaway, Scott L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mysql (E-mail)"
