That would be great. Thanks!
Sincerely,
Steven Roussey
http://Network54.com/?pp=e
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian P. Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:45 pm
> Subject: RE: Request for help in testing new replication code in 4.0.2
it up if it's something you might find useful.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Roussey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:41 PM
To: 'Sasha Pachev'
Cc: 'Mysql'
Subject: Re: Request for help in testing new replication code in 4.0.2
&g
X]
> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 3:28 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Request for help in testing new replication code in 4.0.2
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 10:24:30PM +0100, Fournier Jocelyn
> [Presence-PC] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
> > * If you want to do it this very moment, read the instructions at
> >http://www.mysql.com/doc/I/n/Installing_source_tree.html and
install a
> > pre-release 4.0.2 MySQL on your test server. You may also wait until
4.0.2 is
> > released, but in that case, replication in 4.0.2 may have a bug
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:41:25PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
>
> So I need your help with field testing of my code. For those of you
> who are wondering why you should - this will help us stabilize 4.0 a
> lot of faster, and not only replication, but also the general SQL
> features. So if you de
I don't actually see the error message in the output you sent. but I found a
similar problem yesterday and have the following work around:
= myisamchk.c 1.69 vs edited =
*** /tmp/myisamchk.c-1.69-20535 Thu Feb 7 17:21:33 2002
--- edited/myisamchk.c Sat Feb 9 22:48:57 2002
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: Request for help in testing new replication code in 4.0.2
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:41:25PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> > Dear MySQL users
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 10:24:30PM +0100, Fournier Jocelyn [Presence-PC] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In myisamchk.c replace the following line :
>
>if (argument && *argument == '0')
> DBUG_POP();
> else
> DBUG_PUSH(argument ? argument : "d:t:o,/tmp/myisamchk.trace");
>
> by
>
> if
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: Request for help in testing new replication code in 4.0.2
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:41:25PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> > Dear MySQL users
Dear MySQL users,
I have just pushed my latest changes in the replication code in our 4.0
development tree, which change the slave to use two threads - I/O thread that
gets the data from the master and logs it, and SQL thread which processes the
logged data. I have tested it extensively, and i
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:41:25PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> Dear MySQL users,
>
> I have just pushed my latest changes in the replication code in our
> 4.0 development tree, which change the slave to use two threads -
> I/O thread that gets the data from the master and logs it, and SQL
> thre
> * If you want to do it this very moment, read the instructions at
>http://www.mysql.com/doc/I/n/Installing_source_tree.html and install a
> pre-release 4.0.2 MySQL on your test server. You may also wait until 4.0.2
is
> released, but in that case, replication in 4.0.2 may have a bug you cou
On Sunday 10 February 2002 02:20 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> I run `BUILD/compile-pentium --prefix=/home/mysql` and it fails after
> several minutes. ?The output is large, so I've posted it here:
>
> ? http://public.yahoo.com/~jzawodn/mysql-build.log
>
> (the good stuff is at the end, of course.
On Sunday 10 February 2002 01:17 am, you wrote:
> I can't get it to start replicating.
>
> Note, the master (db1.tias.com) is a 3.23 server. The slave is 4.0.2
> (noritake.tias.com).
>
> On the master I get:
>
> mysql> show master status;
> +---++--+
On Sunday 10 February 2002 06:06 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> One question:
>
> ? Can you explain the relay log a bit. ?Does it shrink eventually? ?I
> ? see it growing and growing, so I don't know if the space is
> ? recycled, or if I need to do something to periodically flush the
> ? executed qu
On Sunday 10 February 2002 01:17 am, you wrote:
> I can't get it to start replicating.
>
> Note, the master (db1.tias.com) is a 3.23 server. The slave is 4.0.2
> (noritake.tias.com).
>
> On the master I get:
>
> mysql> show master status;
> +---++--+
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:41:25PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
>
> So I need your help with field testing of my code. For those of you
> who are wondering why you should - this will help us stabilize 4.0 a
> lot of faster, and not only replication, but also the general SQL
> features. So if you de
I don't actually see the error message in the output you sent. but I found a
similar problem yesterday and have the following work around:
= myisamchk.c 1.69 vs edited =
*** /tmp/myisamchk.c-1.69-20535 Thu Feb 7 17:21:33 2002
--- edited/myisamchk.c Sat Feb 9 22:48:57 2002
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 10:24:30PM +0100, Fournier Jocelyn [Presence-PC] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In myisamchk.c replace the following line :
>
>if (argument && *argument == '0')
> DBUG_POP();
> else
> DBUG_PUSH(argument ? argument : "d:t:o,/tmp/myisamchk.trace");
>
> by
>
> if
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: Request for help in testing new replication code in 4.0.2
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:41:25PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> > Dear MySQL users
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:41:25PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> Dear MySQL users,
>
> I have just pushed my latest changes in the replication code in our
> 4.0 development tree, which change the slave to use two threads -
> I/O thread that gets the data from the master and logs it, and SQL
> thre
> * If you want to do it this very moment, read the instructions at
>http://www.mysql.com/doc/I/n/Installing_source_tree.html and install a
> pre-release 4.0.2 MySQL on your test server. You may also wait until 4.0.2
is
> released, but in that case, replication in 4.0.2 may have a bug you cou
Dear MySQL users,
I have just pushed my latest changes in the replication code in our 4.0
development tree, which change the slave to use two threads - I/O thread that
gets the data from the master and logs it, and SQL thread which processes the
logged data. I have tested it extensively, and i
23 matches
Mail list logo
