Hi,
I'm trying to compile from the development source tree (bitkeeper)
version 4.1.3-beta, on a Mandrake 9.2 box. It keeps failing to compile
in ndb/src/kernel/ArrayPool.hpp. I am trying to compile it with cluster,
since that is what I need to test. I've done all the autoconf/etc steps,
and mad
Norris,
Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 6:54:46 PM, you wrote:
Neoen> I have been using (very happily) mysql on unix boxes. I am in a new job and
Neoen> there is not a unix box in sight!!! ouch!
Neoen> This is a windows 2000 shop. Here is the situation and I am looking for any
Neoen> and all sugge
Group,
I have been using (very happily) mysql on unix boxes. I am in a new job and
there is not a unix box in sight!!! ouch!
This is a windows 2000 shop. Here is the situation and I am looking for any
and all suggestions:
1) I have mysql, apache, perl, etc running on my own box and I have
True, but his question was about Windows NT Server.
-Original Message-
From: Sommai Fongnamthip [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 2:16 AM
To: Gerald R. Jensen; Garth Hansen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Version question...
3.23.40 is stable on
exist in
>3.22.xx or were not fine-tuned to the extent they are in the current stuff.
>
>Gerald Jensen
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Garth Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:29 PM
>Subject
- Original Message -
From: "Garth Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: Version question...
Quick question for everyone
Which is the most stable version of MySQL for Windows NT Server version 4.0
S
- Original Message -
From: "Garth Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: Version question...
Quick question for everyone
Which is the most stable version of MySQL for Windows NT Server version 4.0
S
- Original Message -
From: "Garth Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: Version question...
Quick question for everyone
Which is the most stable version of MySQL for Windows NT Server version 4.0
S
- Original Message -
From: "Garth Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: Version question...
Quick question for everyone
Which is the most stable version of MySQL for Windows NT Server version 4.0
S
Quick question for everyone
Which is the most stable version of MySQL for Windows NT Server version 4.0
SP6?
I have conflicting information as to which is more stable, and want to be
sure I use the most appropriate version for what we are trying to do.
Also, if there is some major reasons to
At 7:27 PM -0400 6/19/01, Mario Kent wrote:
>I installed 3.23.38 from source on a linux server, a status simply says:
>Server version: 3.23.38
>Now, I just installed 3.23.39 from source on another linux server and it
>displays:
>Server version: 3.23.39-log
>
>I want to know what the -log means and
I installed 3.23.38 from source on a linux server, a status simply says:
Server version: 3.23.38
Now, I just installed 3.23.39 from source on another linux server and it
displays:
Server version: 3.23.39-log
I want to know what the -log means and how it got in there.
[In order to get this messag
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mario Kent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: Version question: -log & no -log ?
>
> Your message cannot be posted because it appears to be either spam or
> simply
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mario Kent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: Version question: -log & no -log ?
>
> Your message cannot be posted because it appears to be either spam or
> simply
14 matches
Mail list logo
