RE: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-30 Thread Rick James
e- > From: Claudio Nanni [mailto:claudio.na...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 6:31 AM > To: Brown, Charles > Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com > Subject: RE: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM. > > Charles, > > I think going back to MyISAM as default is a good

Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-29 Thread Brown, Charles
Well said. Thanks so much. Sent from my iPhone On Apr 29, 2012, at 8:02 AM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: > > > Am 29.04.2012 14:50, schrieb Brown: >> is a complain I received from one of my developer that after following our >> MySQL >> Cluster migration, tables are now defaulting to innodb (how

RE: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-29 Thread Claudio Nanni
iliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective > > owners. > > > > Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the current input > statement. > > > > mysql> > > > > &

Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.04.2012 14:50, schrieb Brown: > is a complain I received from one of my developer that after following our > MySQL > Cluster migration, tables are now defaulting to innodb (how can he tell) as already said: the builtin default has changed an you have to configure MyISAM as default your

RE: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-29 Thread Brown, Charles
are parameters that have sustain me over the years. Now, I'm doing MySql Cluster are they any more relevant. Best regards, From: Claudio Nanni [mailto:claudio.na...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 4:29 AM To: Brown, Charles Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com Subject: Re: engine is now

Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-29 Thread Claudio Nanni
t > statement. > > ** ** > > mysql> > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Claudio Nanni [mailto:claudio.na...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:48 PM > *To:* Brown, Charles > *Cc:* mysql@lists.mysql.com &g

Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-28 Thread Claudio Nanni
; From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net] > Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 3:01 AM > To: mysql@lists.mysql.com > Subject: Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM. > > > > Am 28.04.2012 09:00, schrieb Brown: > > We recently switched from MySQL community to Mysql

RE: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-28 Thread Brown, Charles
Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net] Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 3:01 AM To: mysql@lists.mysql.com Subject: Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM. Am 28.04.2012 09:00, schrieb Brown: > We recently switched from MySQL community to Mysql clustered using Oracle > supported MySQl. The p

Re: engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-28 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 28.04.2012 09:00, schrieb Brown: > We recently switched from MySQL community to Mysql clustered using Oracle > supported MySQl. The problem is, during our testing phase, we observed the > default engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM. Any thoughts on that? We're >

engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM.

2012-04-28 Thread Brown, Charles
Hello all, We recently switched from MySQL community to Mysql clustered using Oracle supported MySQl. The problem is, during our testing phase, we observed the default engine is now innoDB instead of MyISAM. Any thoughts on that? We're not getting the performance that we expected