Hello MC,
any results yet by any chance ? What conclusion did you get out of your test ?
There is another threat going on with the subject line Re: best-performing
CPU + platform for MySQL now? Opteron? OpenBSD? SuSE?
Best regards
Nils Valentin
Tokyo/Japan
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 12:39,
Sorry last e-mail didnt contain all text for whatever reason it should be like
this:
--
Hello MC,
any results yet by any chance ? What conclusion did you get out of your
test ?
There is another threat going on with the subject line Re: best-performing
CPU + platform for MySQL now?
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:46:02AM -0500, Pete Harlan wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 06:26:23PM +0300, Egor Egorov wrote:
...
No. I've forgot to tell that the -Max binary is linked dynamically
because it uses SSL.
Is there a reason the SSL libraries can't also be linked statically?
I
Pete Harlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. I've forgot to tell that the -Max binary is linked dynamically
because it uses SSL.
Is there a reason the SSL libraries can't also be linked statically?
There was some reasons. Afair, MySQL is not the only software which could not
be statically
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 06:26:23PM +0300, Egor Egorov wrote:
...
No. I've forgot to tell that the -Max binary is linked dynamically
because it uses SSL.
Is there a reason the SSL libraries can't also be linked statically?
Do you recommend against running the -Max binary, because it doesn't
use
mc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious if I have got something wrong with my eyes or fingers:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mysql-max-4.0.20-unknown-linux-x86_64]# ldd bin/mysqld
librt.so.1 = /lib64/tls/librt.so.1 (0x003c71f0)
libdl.so.2 = /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x003c7190)
[snip]
No. I've forgot to tell that the -Max binary is linked dynamically because
it uses
SSL.
Here are the results from my installation... in case you may find them
useful :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# file
mysql-standard-4.0.20-unknown-linux-x86_64/bin/mysqld
Just curious if I have got something wrong with my eyes or fingers:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mysql-max-4.0.20-unknown-linux-x86_64]# ldd bin/mysqld
librt.so.1 = /lib64/tls/librt.so.1 (0x003c71f0)
libdl.so.2 = /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x003c7190)
libpthread.so.0 =
[snip]
Debian is our first choice, but on the Debian/AMD64 howto, it is stated
that
the port is still in beta stage. Does anyone have experiences with
debian/amd64 + mysql? I would love to know if mysql will run on it before
giving it a try..
[snip]
AFAIK, Debian is now voting on whether to
bad corn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently our company has purchased a dual amd64 opteron machine for mysql
server purpose.
Whatever Linux you choose please better run MySQL officialy built binaries. Due
to some known glibc/gcc issues the officially built binary performs better that
custom
Hi all,
Recently our company has purchased a dual amd64 opteron machine for mysql
server purpose.
It seems that there are not many os choices for us.
Here is the list of OS that we are going to test (in listed order):
- debian (amd64)
- fedora2 (amd64)
- suse (amd64 or 32bit mode)
-
bad corn wrote:
Hi all,
Recently our company has purchased a dual amd64 opteron machine for mysql
server purpose.
It seems that there are not many os choices for us.
Here is the list of OS that we are going to test (in listed order):
- debian (amd64)
- fedora2 (amd64)
- suse (amd64
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 05:31, Daniel Kasak wrote:
As you probably know, not all software is perfectly supported on x86-64
under Linux at the moment. This includes glibc, gcc, binutils, etc.
There are always patches coming in. If you run Gentoo, you have
*incredibly* painless updates to ALL
13 matches
Mail list logo
