The server blocks any IP that connects more than a dozen time at the
same moment (DoS and download accellerators).
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:57:57PM -0400, Greg Depasse wrote:
Anyone else having trouble getting to atrpms.net? I'm not subscribed
to their mailing list, and I can't get to the
I figured, but why would my single apt-get dist-upgrade cause it to
think I am a leet hax0rz? It worked for me again about 5 minutes ago,
but 1/2way through the dist-upgrade it went poof again :(On 6/14/05, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The server blocks any IP that connects more than a
Same thing just happened to me.
On 6/14/05, Justin Popa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I figured, but why would my single apt-get dist-upgrade cause it to think I
am a leet hax0rz? It worked for me again about 5 minutes ago, but 1/2way
through the dist-upgrade it went poof again :(
On 6/14/05,
Looks like it's back up!
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
The server blocks any IP that connects more than a dozen time at the
same moment (DoS and download accellerators).
A good feature for internet facing servers but can it be tweeked? I
think the yum client in FC4 along with some casual browsing
Good question. The same thing just happened to me. I'm
following Jarod's guide to install Myth on a PIII-500Mhz (not exactly a
screaming machine). I do have a 7Mbps cable internet connection
though. Maybe that's allowing the requests to complete to fast?!
I really do appreciate all the effort
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:44:36PM -0400, Scott wrote:
On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
The server blocks any IP that connects more than a dozen time at the
same moment (DoS and download accellerators).
A good feature for internet facing servers but can it be tweeked? I
On 6/14/05, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disconnecting and reconnecting is OK, the script only checks for = 20
*concurrent* connections. If yum really behaves unproper, please use
apt.
Was atrpms down at all yesterday, or if I could not dl, did that mean
I was being blocked? I tried
On Jun 14, 2005, at 2:48 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
Disconnecting and reconnecting is OK, the script only checks for = 20
*concurrent* connections. If yum really behaves unproper, please use
apt.
This is my first attempt at using atrpms.net so I'm not familiar with
the history of the site. Is
Please, before anyone else send me his private IP address: ATrpms
currently moves 1TB/day, I cannot browse the logs for any failed
connection out there.
Avoid using anything that will penalize the server more than
required. If yum does indeed fire up several connections w/o closing
them, please
Still getting blocked as of 5pm eastern. Using apt here. I'm guessing
you've sorted and counted your logs on ip address? Maybe your getting a DOS
attack from somewhere.
- JM
At 04:28 PM 06/14/2005, Axel Thimm wrote:
Please, before anyone else send me his private IP address: ATrpms
currently
Axel,
How often is the blocking cleared?
I've been blocked for about a bit over a day now and I'm rather amazed
that it appears at least half dozen (or more) people are having this
problem.
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:44:36PM -0400, Scott wrote:
On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:10
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 05:37:57PM -0700, Kenneth Hadley wrote:
Axel,
How often is the blocking cleared?
Not really often. I think I cleared it twice since the release.
I've been blocked for about a bit over a day now
Certainly has been cleared in the last 24h. What have you been doing?
Is
On Jun 14, 2005, at 9:18 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
Certainly has been cleared in the last 24h. What have you been doing?
Is it yum again
Just back from dinner and found my IP unblocked. This time I was just
browsing with Safari on Mac OS X and found myself blocked again after
about a dozen or
I was unblocked... but suprise here... I am blocked again. This time I got to 214 of 290ish though!On 6/14/05, Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Jun 14, 2005, at 9:18 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
Certainly has been cleared in the last 24h. What have you been doing? Is it yum againJust back from dinner
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 05:37:57PM -0700, Kenneth Hadley wrote:
Axel,
How often is the blocking cleared?
Not really often. I think I cleared it twice since the release.
I've been blocked for about a bit over a day now
Certainly has been cleared in the
It happened to me again tonight. I'm just trying to perform a simple
'apt-get dist-upgrade' on a fresh install of FC3. Oh well.
On 6/14/05, Justin Popa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was unblocked... but suprise here... I am blocked again. This time I got
to 214 of 290ish though!
On 6/14/05,
In the correct thread now...
For those who didnt see my post from earlier, I am back to using
another repository for the at-stable information.
http://mirrors.ircam.fr pub/atrpms/fedora/3/en/i386 at-stable
This should be a near perfect mirror. It's working 100% for me right
now. Don't mean to
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 22:19 -0400, Justin Popa wrote:
In the correct thread now...
For those who didnt see my post from earlier, I am back to using
another repository for the at-stable information.
http://mirrors.ircam.fr pub/atrpms/fedora/3/en/i386 at-stable
This should be a near
SBC DSL IP address is currently blocked, my Charter Cable connection is not.
Justin Popa wrote:
In the correct thread now...
For those who didnt see my post from earlier, I am back to using
another repository for the at-stable information.
http://mirrors.ircam.fr pub/atrpms/fedora/3/en/i386
Hmmm... I was hoping we were all comcast, then we could assume it was
comcast. Although, SBC and comcast could both be shooting crap through
some accelerator that is making this explode, but I think it's more of
an issue with Axel. The only reason I say so, is the only problems I
am experiencing
For the record, I am on Optus DSL in Australia and was having the same
issue. I haven't tried since last night, but it sound like it is
re-occurring for most people.
I will give it a go when I get home and report back.
Whytey out
On 6/15/05, Justin Popa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm... I was
I've been thinking about it, and given this information, it is most
likely the blockage. What if Axel(as a test) upped the concurrent
connection limit up to 20, and made it so that it refreshes every 60
mins? To me this would seem to be a nice fix for us(maybe) That or I
guess the question to ask
23 matches
Mail list logo
