On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, M. Barnabas Luntzel wrote:
before you get too deep in this, and maybe I dont know about sun blades
(definitely dont know much) but is this a sun machine with SPARC
processor(s)? Has anybody installed this mess on a sun sparc, maybe sparc
linux (solaris seems unlikely)? if the
before you get too deep in this, and maybe I dont know about sun blades
(definitely dont know much) but is this a sun machine with SPARC
processor(s)? Has anybody installed this mess on a sun sparc, maybe
sparc linux (solaris seems unlikely)? if there are success stories of
mythtv on sun ha
If I understand what you are shooting for then the
good soultion would be a SAN with a shared filesystem, OpenGFS
for example. It might look something like:
- /{Fe1}
|MBe|---{SAN Array/OpenGFS}---|NFS Server|---{LAN}-{Fe2}
-
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:00:00PM -0800, Matt Picker wrote:
> I'm no seasoned pro myself but I would go with the
> external scsi solution. You can usually find a scsi
> card and an external enclosure for a steal somewhere.
> Like if you happened to work at a company that kept
> old equipment...
I'm no seasoned pro myself but I would go with the
external scsi solution. You can usually find a scsi
card and an external enclosure for a steal somewhere.
Like if you happened to work at a company that kept
old equipment... :) Another solution would maybe be to
isolate the file server from your
Disk I/O shouldn't be a problem, all disks we are planning on using are
either FC (we have 2x36GB drives) or SCSI320 (we have like a box of them)
and we want to use a Sun Blade 1000 (2x900MHz uSPARCs with dual PCI buses
and FC controller). I think I'll tell my roommate that we need it all on one
sy
My roomate scored some equipment at a .com auction ... a LCD projector, some
SCSI hard drives, some LCD monitors ... but the cream of the crop is a Sun
Blade 1000. It has 2 36Gig FC drives, it has one SCSI connector open so we
can throw a system disk in there. it has 4 PCI slots and we were going t
Bear Paw wrote:
Greetings peoples ... I'm really new at MythTV but I've been tracking
its progress for some time. My question has to do making a really weird
setup.
System one: 4 tuner cards, records and encodes shows and transfers them
to fileserver
System two: File server, this will hold the
Is there a reason for caching?
How about
set up a NFS share from System two to System one
then just have System one record directly on System two.
Dan Littlejohn
+++
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:24:24 -0800, Bear Paw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings peoples ... I'm really new at MythTV
I'd combine 1 and 2 into a master backend that the frontends connect to.
And no, this is not a weird way to use MythTV...
Josh
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:24:24 -0800, Bear Paw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings peoples ... I'm really new at MythTV but I've been tracking its
> progress for so
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:24:24 -0800, Bear Paw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings peoples ... I'm really new at MythTV but I've been tracking its
> progress for some time. My question has to do making a really weird setup.
>
> System one: 4 tuner cards, records and encodes shows and transf
Greetings peoples ... I'm really new at MythTV but
I've been tracking its progress for some time. My question has to do making a
really weird setup.
System one: 4 tuner cards, records and encodes
shows and transfers them to fileserver
System two: File server, this will hold the MythTV
back
12 matches
Mail list logo
