That's an Athlon XP 2600+, not a 2.6GHz Athlon XP.
Look it up. On 11/10/05, Fredrik Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, hadn't seen that. Then I really should redo the benchmark and doit properly to see if there is any difference. However, (e.g. a 1.6 GHz Pentium M can typically attain the
However...
I used the test script found here
http://www.xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/sultra_skami.html
on the Mobile Pentium 4 1600 MHz with Gentoo installed. THe script
completed in 17 seconds , with some apps running. Comparing this to
other reports, my 1600 MHz with Gentoo on it is as good as
On 11/5/05, Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The performance improvement is pretty much a myth (no pun intended).
The beauty of gentoo is in it's package management and flexibility. The
conventional wisdom at present seem to be that you might notice a
performance improvement on very low end
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 11:38:05 -0500
Myth Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I exagerated the amount of time a bit :) But even over night is
unacceptable to me given the 'little' performance improvement you get.
The performance improvement is pretty much a myth (no pun intended).
The beauty of
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Myth Lists
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. November 2005 16:26
An: Discussion about mythtv
Betreff: Re: [mythtv-users] Is gentoo the way to go?
Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm a Gentoo user...
I have Gentoo
___
mythtv-users mailing list
mythtv-users@mythtv.org
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Yes, you must have missed something. It took me not longer than one night to
compile the whole gentoo system from stage 2, including