> >I think the PVR 500 is a fine choice, I have a similar setup (DirecTV/2
> >tuners/2 PVR 250s).
>One receiver?
Two receivers. I have one connected to a serial cable (the old 9 pin UART
deal) and one attached to a USB port using a cable I refer to as
"Frankencable." Controlled by means of a c
> The tuners in the Hauppage PVR series are analog tuners -- they
> convert analog NTSC or PAL (etc) signals into MPEG2. To give them a
> signal to record, your source needs to be a clean analog signal,
> either from the antenna or cable, or from a converter box.
The PVR tuners can also capture an
Let me see if can calrify a few things.
On 12/20/05, Dhaval Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > > My questions are the following:
> > >
> > > - I would like to watch live TV so I am considering getting a
> > > dual tuner card that is well supported by MythTV
William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > My questions are the following:
> >
> > - I would like to watch live TV so I am considering getting a
> > dual tuner card that is well supported by MythTV and has a
> > hardware encoder/decoder. I am considering the PVR 500. Do
> > you have comments/sugges
"R. Geoffrey Newbury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:01:31 -0500, Bob Coffman Jr. wrote:
>
> > I would like to watch live TV so I am considering getting a dual tuner
> >card that is well supported by MythTV and has a hardware encoder/decoder. I
> >am
> >considering the PVR500
On 12/20/05, Matt Mossholder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 16:50 -0500, Fred Squires wrote:
You don't need a second coax connector on the PVR-500. The card splits the signal internally when you're using coax.
--
I probably still have a few (well,
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 16:50 -0500, Fred Squires wrote:
You don't need a second coax connector on the PVR-500. The card splits the signal internally when you're using coax.
--
I probably still have a few (well, now a whole bunch) gmail invites.
Drop me a line (off list)
my PVR-500 came with an extra connector that allows me to hook upanother s-vid in. i don't remember if it has a second coax in on it
or not. but it basically gives you a separate connection for eachchip on the card.so it can be used exactly like two separate cards.You don't need a second coax con
> My questions are the following:
>
> - I would like to watch live TV so I am considering getting a
> dual tuner card that is well supported by MythTV and has a
> hardware encoder/decoder. I am considering the PVR 500. Do
> you have comments/suggestions?
A couple of other things to consider. F
On 12/20/05, Bruce Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The PVR500 has 2 tuners running off one cable/antenna input. It has
> > S-video and composite inputs. ...
>
> Can I use a PVR500 if I have two different inputs?
> (one from analog cable and one from my cable box)
>
> i.e. Can I run the an
> The PVR500 has 2 tuners running off one cable/antenna input. It has
> S-video and composite inputs. ...
Can I use a PVR500 if I have two different inputs?
(one from analog cable and one from my cable box)
i.e. Can I run the analog cable to an input on the PVR500, and
run the digital cable box
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:01:31 -0500, Bob Coffman Jr. wrote:
>>- I would like to watch live TV so I am considering getting a dual tuner
>card that is
>well supported by MythTV and has a hardware encoder/decoder. I am
>considering the PVR
>500. Do you have comments/suggestions?
>
>I think the PVR 500
>- I would like to watch live TV so I am considering getting a dual tuner
card that is
well supported by MythTV and has a hardware encoder/decoder. I am
considering the PVR
500. Do you have comments/suggestions?
I think the PVR 500 is a fine choice, I have a similar setup (DirecTV/2
tuners/2 PVR 2
13 matches
Mail list logo
