My non-scientific measurements (i.e. pings to well known european
sites) show an increase in packet loss to about 6%, the 10 day
average previously was less than 1%.
Neither ns.ebone.net nor auth1.ebone.net are answering queries.
BGP data still looks normal
KPNQwest data
For those who don't know, Ebone had a policy of zero packet loss on the
network 99.5% of the time and we managed to exceed this on almost all of
our links.
You mean like every other service provider? :-)
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Sabri Berisha wrote:
AMS-IX graphs seem to have a glitch, or one heck of a DDOS.
http://www.ams-ix.net/hugegraph.html
This was a power outage.
I doubt the dip in the graph, which looks to me like about 1G missing
between 12:00-19:00 was just from that 3 second power
Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these:
Jul 3 08:23:06 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 08:23:46 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 270
Jul 3 08:27:45 MDT:
Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these:
Yes, but I saw it only once from four different sources:
Through AS1:
Jul 3 07:23:56: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for aspath, requested
size 266
Through AS6461:
Jul 3 07:22:51: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS:
Of course it would be towards the end of the table.
Here's a sample of the more detailed log at http://www.rockynet.com/wtf.html
*i205.139.72.0 a.b.c.d 101 0 3561 23037
{1239,1785,2379,4323,4513,4546,4969,5006,5676,5778,6181,6253,6347,6395,6453,
I see the same from AS 16517 -
* 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701
3561 23037 {80,109,122,...
Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037
Could IMC Internet (ASN-IMC-BGP) be the source of the problem.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
Mike Lewinski wrote:
Of
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I see the same from AS 16517 -
* 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701
3561 23037 {80,109,122,...
Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037
Could IMC Internet (ASN-IMC-BGP) be the source of the problem.
We've opened a ticket with
We've had 4 crashes with chunk corruption
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 10:46, Mike Lewinski wrote:
Anyone else receiving huge as-path (more than 125) causing these:
Jul 3 08:23:06 MDT: %BGP-3-INSUFCHUNKS: Insufficient chunk pools for
aspath, requested size 268
Jul 3 08:23:46 MDT:
TWiMC:
No doubt most with the responsibility of doing so received this
statement, but
OWN 'M IF YOU GOT 'M--clean up the databases
(Unfortunately for me I just paid a $250 on June 27th--lucky me.)
j
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf
This has disappeared from here...
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I see the same from AS 16517 -
* 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701
3561 23037 {80,109,122,...
Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037
Could IMC Internet (ASN-IMC-BGP) be the source of the
TWiMC:
No doubt most with the responsibility of doing so received this
statement, but
OWN 'M IF YOU GOT 'M--clean up the databases
(Unfortunately for me I just paid a $250 on June 27th--lucky me.)
j
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Please correct me if I am wrong. This is not allowing the practice of
selling IPs or ASes,
I've never really come around to fully understand the notion (more and
more common, it seems) of _selling_ such..? (Maybe I'm an idealist :)
but it encourages those of us who have acquired other
The intension is to get the information correct. If company X took over
another company who owned a couple /whatevers, or if a company merely
changed their name and wanted their ASN to represent that, it would cost
$250 to change. Many companies, who aren't in the we sell IPs
business, don't
14 matches
Mail list logo
