In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sean
Donelan writes:
>
>On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Richard Forno wrote:
>> In my last post when I said this:
>> > If something's deemed 'critical' to a large segment of the population, the
>n
>> > security must NEVER outweigh conveinience. Period. Non-negotiable.
>>
>> I
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Richard Forno wrote:
> In my last post when I said this:
> > If something's deemed 'critical' to a large segment of the population, then
> > security must NEVER outweigh conveinience. Period. Non-negotiable.
>
> I meant to say that security must ALWAYS outweigh convienience.
This is obviously a "great truth" - a statement whose opposite is also
true.
Regards and Best Wishes
Marshall Eubanks
On Tuesday, December 24, 2002, at 03:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 10:26:09 EST, Richard Forno said:
In my last post when I said this:
If something's d
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 10:26:09 EST, Richard Forno said:
> In my last post when I said this:
> > If something's deemed 'critical' to a large segment of the population, then
> > security must NEVER outweigh conveinience. Period. Non-negotiable.
> I meant to say that security must ALWAYS outweigh convie
Does anybody know a _working_ contact at rackspace.com?
Greetz, Peter
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.dataloss.nl/ | Undernet:#clue
http://www.blinkenlights.nl/party/ - birthday party (page in Dutch)
all geeks invited - send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info
Just another opportunity to grab some funding. The two major events at
our local facility the past year have been the result of drivers taking
out major power poles on the street adjacent to the facility. One even
ended up in the parking lot. UPS/gen sets worked as planned so little
impact on cust
In my last post when I said this:
> If something's deemed 'critical' to a large segment of the population, then
> security must NEVER outweigh conveinience. Period. Non-negotiable.
I meant to say that security must ALWAYS outweigh convienience.
My goofguess I had too much NOG and not enoug
