The Space Shuttle Columbia seems to have broken up during re-entry
over Texas.
You might need to check your connections to the major news sources and
NASA as your users start looking for information.
:-(
Darin
The Space Shuttle Columbia seems to have broken up during re-entry
over Texas.
Verified.
The challenger in 1986 was the first international news even I heard
about via the 'net.
fletcher
On 1 Feb 2003 at 7:42, Darin Wayrynen wrote:
The Space Shuttle Columbia seems to have broken up during re-entry
over Texas. [...]
Heard the boom. Sounded like a minor ground impact -- no
accompanying higher-frequency noise. Didn't know what it was -- I
hadn't paid attention to the
shnipp Data Protection stuff
At least theoretically, the US *is* supposed to have a comparable system.
European privacy law makes it illegal to transfer personal data of any kind
to a country without a comparable system - the US has a voluntary Safe
Haven scheme that is supposed to enable US
If you are a NTT/Verio customer and wish to obtain
multicast services, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Jared
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 09:28:33AM -0800, Lucy E. Lynch wrote:
Just a brief reminder -
NASA TV is available via multicast. Look for:
NASA television in MPEG-1
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Scott Weeks wrote:
Hello,
I write this to ask network operators to share your statistics of this
flash crowd with NANOG.
For example, if possible, could NASA folks let us know the peak and
average hit rate to NASA TV (rtsp://198.116.66.254) or the traffic rates
on the
http://www.nasa.gov
is responding fast, but home page has been simplified and only contain
STS-107 Emergency Notice.
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov
seems to be suffering from the load.
Rubens
- Original Message -
From: Darin Wayrynen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Darin
Link's at the bottom: http://www.nasa.gov/home.html NASA TV (link at the
bottom of that page) is maxed out on streams...
scott
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:
:
:
: http://www.nasa.gov
: is responding fast, but home page has been simplified and only contain
: STS-107 Emergency
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Scott Weeks wrote:
BTW folks are interested, but there is little data coming in to share.
As time goes on, I hope folks that show unusual traffic levels (on both
sides; eyeball networks and content networks as well as transit networks)
will send pointers to me that I can
Hi,
Whilst our statistics may be important let us also not forget the seven
families for whom today has been a nightmare.
Steve Dyer
There is not a big spike in multicast traffic as there was on 9/11/2001.
NASA TV multicast only has reports from 3 viewers at present, which
suggest
a total viewership of 10 or less.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 06:02 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Sat, 1 Feb
From: Sean Donelan
Historically providers have been reluctant to provide that level of
detail concerning traffic levels. A few providers, generally smaller
ones, do make MRTG graphs available. Once in a while a provider will
announce they had X Peta/Terrabytes of traffic for some time
: Whilst our statistics may be important let us also not forget the seven
: families for whom today has been a nightmare.
No, let's don't forget. Although I use an old unix account in Maui, I now
live in Friendswood, Texas. 3 miles from Ellington and 5 or so miles from
NASA's JSC. My
13 matches
Mail list logo
