On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, John Fraizer wrote:
: As has been stated by others, UltraDNS, like the roots and other TLD hosts
: is under nearly constant attack. Perhaps your local nodes were effected
: by an attack. IE; the pipe was full but the service was still alive so the
: anycast prefix wasn't
The hands-down winner, so far, is the Cisco
CMS-formerly-known-as-Arrowpoint, which has an RJ45 console cable
which WILL NOT WORK, full stop, with the RJ45 connectors on Cisco's
own console servers.
*wild applause*
Ah, yes. I've run into that bad boy. It really stinks to come in to
work in the
Actually, as awkward as those rubber hoods are, what I like about them is
that when you're pulling a disconnected patch cable through a rat's nest
of wires, they prevent the plastic tab from being bent backward.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, John Palmer wrote:
Thats to prevent it from being
Bill, I know you know better, so let's try more facts and less
FUD. Mmmmkay? Your above paragraph is a red herring that is
analogous to saying all multihomed services must be run on the
router itself.
yes, it does lean that way... but to expose a sigma-six
blip in how some
TV Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:22:19 -0400 (EDT)
TV From: Todd Vierling
TV Sucks to be anyone trying to use the service whose routers
TV pick those nodes as the only ones available. That's the
TV fault of the implementor, not the client.
Yes.
TV The major issue here is that no *gTLD*,
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, E.B. Dreger wrote:
: EBD That's why one uses a daemon with main loop including
: EBD something like:
: EBD
: EBD success = 0 ;
: EBD for ( i = checklist ; i-callback != NULL ; i++ )
: EBD success = i-callback(foo) ;
: EBD if ( success )
: EBD
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, as awkward as those rubber hoods are, what I like about them is
that when you're pulling a disconnected patch cable through a rat's nest
of wires, they prevent the plastic tab from being bent backward.
Since you are the second person to
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: bmanning
Bill, I know you know better, so let's try more facts and less
FUD. Mmmmkay? Your above paragraph is a red herring that is
analogous to saying all multihomed services must be run on the
router itself.
yes, it does
Actually, as awkward as those rubber hoods are, what I like
about them is that when you're pulling a disconnected patch
cable through a rat's nest of wires, they prevent the plastic
tab from being bent backward.
True but there are also snagless connectors available where the release
tab
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 02:39:51PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, as awkward as those rubber hoods are, what I like about them is
that when you're pulling a disconnected patch cable through a rat's nest
of wires, they prevent the plastic tab from being bent backward.
Not a
Hello all,
Was doing some upgrades on a UBR7246 (to a VXR), and I got to thinking
about short sighted design considerations. I was curious if any of you
had some pet peeves from a design perspective to rant about. I'll start
with a couple.
snip
try cisco-nsp. Single vendor stuff is
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MAC addresses are not without authority delegation. The IEEE is the ultimate
authority in said case.
Any solution which requires uniqueness also requires a singular ultimate
authority.
Even MACs aren't entirely unique. Some places used
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the goal were unique identification, MAC addresses would do just fine.
No need for DNS.
MAC addresses are not without authority delegation. The IEEE is the ultimate
authority in said case.
Yep... But have you seen any controversy
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:08:43 EDT, Bob German [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Can anyone point me to a set of standards that define a Class A Data
Center? I'm not asking for requirements, but an actual pointer to
standards hammered out by an
Hello All ,
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Gerald wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, as awkward as those rubber hoods are, what I like about them is
that when you're pulling a disconnected patch cable through a rat's nest
of wires, they prevent the plastic tab
Hello Whoever ,
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MAC addresses are not without authority delegation. The IEEE is the ultimate
authority in said case.
Any solution which requires uniqueness also requires a singular
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:10:57 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
manufacturer assigned macs are guaranteed to be globally unique.
Theoretically. I didn't experience it personally, but I believe there
was at least one fairly well known event a few years back where a
manufacturer shipped cards
There was another manufacturer one of the really low budget cards, I
forget the brand but they were shipped in a box which looked like a
dunkin's munchkins box. If you bought several boxes of these, I think six
in a box and the entire package was $30 you were likely to find more than
2 or 3
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, John Fraizer wrote:
: Todd, you don't make the announcement for the anycast address from your
: border.. You do it from within the anycast cluster as a CONDITIONAL
: announcement. IE; you use a specially written BGP daemon that makes the
: announcement when the service is
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, John Kristoff wrote:
Fortunately, this practice rarely occurs these days (token ring / SNA
shops often did this) although I'd be curious if anyone still does it.
box:~ # /sbin/lspci | grep 'Happy'
01:03.1 Ethernet controller: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Happy Meal
To all parties who have posted to NANOG a dozen times or more in the past
24 hours...
For a good time please check out:
http://www.nanog.org/listfaq.html#topics
* Think Before You Post
* When you send mail to the NANOG list, it will be received by
thousands of current and potential peers,
Particularly of interest would be established standards for Class A
Datacenter specifically relating to the physical plant -- Power,
cooling, physical security, etc. I think we can all agree in general on
N+1 everything, and we can go round and round again on what exactly
constitutes Tier-1
Who needs a console port on a Bay? Site angler will save the day!
... Err, sorry, coming off of a power outage with nothing to do but
drink coffee.
-e
-Original Message-
From: Peter E. Fry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
Hello Whoever ,
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
manufacturer assigned macs are guaranteed to be globally unique.
A specific enterprise reconfiguring the mac is akin to an enterprise
using RFC1918
* sigh *
s/there/their/
s/mps/mbs/
s/:)/:}/
8-)
Richard Irving wrote:
Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
Hello Whoever ,
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
manufacturer assigned macs are guaranteed to be globally unique.
A specific
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Particularly of interest would be established standards for Class A
Datacenter specifically relating to the physical plant -- Power,
cooling, physical security, etc. I think we can all agree in general on
N+1 everything, and we can go round and round again on what exactly
Michael Dillon wrote:
Complaining on this mailing list achieves very little but [...]
It did one useful thing; it gave a wide number of operators across
the ISP and infrastructure industries a chance to see what was
happening and put in their two cents. My initial impression was
that the
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Luke Starrett wrote:
True but there are also snagless connectors available where the release
tab actually makes a V shape such as to not catch when you're pulling it
through a cable raceway. They definitely do cost a few more $$ though.
I believe the usual suspects...
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote:
A truely robust anycast setup has two addresses (or networks, or
whatever), but only one per site. From the momentary outage while
BGP reconverges to the very real problem of the service being down
and the route still being announced there are
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Ejay Hire wrote:
Who needs a console port on a Bay? Site angler will save the day!
Get it right! Site Mangler!
What fond memories...
... Err, sorry, coming off of a power outage with nothing to do but
drink coffee.
-e
-Original Message-
From: Peter E.
Dominic J. Eidson wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, John Kristoff wrote:
Fortunately, this practice rarely occurs these days (token ring / SNA
shops often did this) although I'd be curious if anyone still does it.
box:~ # /sbin/lspci | grep 'Happy'
01:03.1 Ethernet controller: Sun
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 02:22:19PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
Sucks to be anyone trying to use the service whose routers pick those nodes
as the only ones available. That's the fault of the implementor, not the
client.
I have a sneaking suspicion that if UltraDNS's tld cluster that
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Todd Vierling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Without a question: PS/2 style keyboard and mouse connectors. Impossible
: to tell from each other,
And this part is somewhat funny, too, because the PS/2 connector layout is
I wanted to discuss the merits of the following:
I have written a proof of concept solution to nuke a route to sitefinder.
Code to those who care or to the list if anyone cares. Perl is
your friend
:)
Basic concept: Use Net::BGP to set up a peering session with my route
server.
Thus spake Stephen J. Wilcox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [18/09/03 18:54]:
So totallymadeupdomain.com now resolves but is unreachable. That will prevent
you from bouncing emails to non-existent domains immediately..
FWIW, the latest versions of postfix have code in them to block connects
from
Was doing some upgrades on a UBR7246 (to a VXR), and I got to thinking
about short sighted design considerations. I was curious if any of you
had some pet peeves from a design perspective to rant about. I'll start
with a couple.
Here are a few of mine:
The little clippy widgets (looks
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 03:53:44PM -0700, Ben Browning wrote:
Procurve switch management interface. Archaic, arcane, insane, unusable.
I'm actually quite happy with the HP ProCurve switch interface, the web
interface is the first thing to be disabled though.
--
Matthew S. Hallacy
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
: Sucks to be anyone trying to use the service whose routers pick those nodes
: as the only ones available. That's the fault of the implementor, not the
: client.
: I think it's out of line to speculate on how UltraDNS has configured
: these
Your all missing my most favorite bad design decision.
And I know that in other areas this has been mentioned and made fun of
enough but ...
Who thought it was a good idea to put braille on the drive up atms?
And having a contact in banking I do know that banks pay extra for this
feature its
The US Congress.
can you say ADA - sure you can - Fred Rodgers
Who thought it was a good idea to put braille on the drive up atms?
--bill (sorry ren, I couldn't resist)
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Todd Vierling wrote:
(Although I noticed that NetBSD's pkgsrc version of bind9 doesn't install
the HTML docs, which are now required in order to understand named.conf
changes. I'll probably submit a change request for that.)
FreeBSD's does. :)
Doug (aka [EMAIL
I'm still trying to find out the point of labeling the light switches in
airplanes. I can see the point of doing it if the button is obvious to
the touch, but on some planes they use membrane switches that aren't
obvious to the touch. I know the ADA probably requires them to label
light switches,
At 04:24 PM 9/18/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The US Congress.
can you say ADA - sure you can - Fred Rodgers
Who thought it was a good idea to put braille on the drive up atms?
While I don't know if the person in question was blind or not, I *have*
seen someone use a drive-up ATM from the
Let the lawsuits begin.
KNOXVILLE, Tenn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 18, 2003--Popular Enterprises LLC, the parent
company of Netster.com, has filed a $100 million dollar lawsuit against VeriSign, Inc.
The Complaint alleges antitrust violations, unfair competition and violations of the
Once upon a time, Ben Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The little clippy widgets (looks kind of like @) on some oldschool racks,
that hold the nut in place for the hex-head bolt. Why these were considered
desirable is beyond me.
We've got a bunch of racks like that (and my PDP8 rack at home
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:14:39 PDT, Scott Granados said:
Who thought it was a good idea to put braille on the drive up atms?
My dad's legally blind. That braille makes it possible for him to get cash
(either from the back seat or step out and walk up) if somebody's
giving him a ride, without
-Original Message-
From: David Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution
Sensitivity: Confidential
snip
I think the whole idea of
I think the whole idea of getting into an escalating
technical war with
Verisign is extremely bad. Your suggestion only makes sense if
you expect
Verisign to make changes to evade technical solutions. Each
such change by
Verisign will cause more breakage. Verisign will either
On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 02:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
manufacturer assigned macs are guaranteed to be globally unique.
A specific enterprise reconfiguring the mac is akin to an enterprise
using RFC1918 space.
I would say _supposed_ to be unique. Surely some cheapo
I think that an interesting interaction involving:
1) Blaster worm DDoS attack against windows update.
2) The default action of Windows 2000 and XP computers
to automatically append the domain name under Network
Identification or the suffix search list to DNS lookups.
3) The number of
101 - 150 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
