NetRange: 4.0.0.0 - 4.255.255.255
ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.level3.net:4321
% telnet rwhois.level3.net 4321
Trying 209.244.1.179...
telnet: connect to address 209.244.1.179: Operation timed out
Doesn't seem to have made much difference yet...
Their rwhois seems to be terminally
wheres the ops in this?
dont get me wrong, i'm sympathetic with new orleans and also definitely not a
bush supporter but this is verging on incitement and i dont see the point of
the
post to here
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This story was sent to you by: Fergie (Paul
(I should note that not only spammers I've seen doing this, many, many,
many folks also have poorly configured/not-working rwhois servers :( )
I think this is due to the fact that the only publicly
available rwhois server is wierd, cantankerous, and
poorly documented.
Perhaps our African
Looking for one that is mostly or fully put together, or a cookbook to
assemble one from parts (i.e. MySQL, PHP, Apache, 3 rubber bands, 2
gallons of perl, etc...).
ARIN themselves are happy to accept your database in
various formats such as CSV files.
LDAP was designed to allow queries to
Stephen J. Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wheres the ops in this?
dont get me wrong, i'm sympathetic with new orleans and also
definitely not a bush supporter but this is verging on incitement
and i dont see the point of the post to here
My guess: someone who doesn't like Paul (and
Way OT, but very interesting- don't know if anyone saw this article about
Yahoo collaborating with the Chinese government's police (from the BBC):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4221538.stm
If this is true, I for one will stop using Yahoo- I have spent alot of time
in Asia
If anyone hasn't figured it out yet, I didn't send this
crap to the list...
- ferg
--
Fergie, a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Look at the headers... it was obviously sent by tribuneinteractive,
and it's pretty unlike Paul to do something like this.
I just binned them as a poor fake, obvious because
they didn't have all the header cruft of real Paul message
brandon
I absolutely am _not_ responsible in any way, shape, or
form, for those messages.
While some of my posts skirt the ever-changing topicality of
the list, you have to admit -- I always send directly from
my webmail account (wouldn't dream of sending from my corporate
account :-)
- ferg
--
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, chip wrote:
On 9/6/05, Joe Maimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the hop(s) following the one you see loss
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3 men die in weekend crashes
While tragic, how is this even *remotely* on-topic for this list?
jms
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Edward Lewis wrote:
Their rwhois seems to be terminally down. Can we reclaim 4/8 from them now?
Who is we?
IANA says it belongs to BBN (ARIN not mentioned):
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
004/8 Dec 92 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.
4/8 is most
This is not shaping up to be a very good month for
Yahoo! all the way around -- at least PR-wise:
http://techdirt.com/articles/20050907/0246214_F.shtml
- ferg
-- Bob Arthurs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Way OT, but very interesting- don't know if anyone saw this article about
Yahoo
Apologies to the 'dawg..
perhaps those responsible would stop, its not very amusing
Steve
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
I absolutely am _not_ responsible in any way, shape, or form, for those
messages.
While some of my posts skirt the ever-changing topicality of the
On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:25 PM, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
If anyone hasn't figured it out yet, I didn't send this
crap to the list...
No, actually, I thought you had just gone insane. =)
Relevant headers from original post (if they can be trusted):
Received: from
Patrick == Patrick W Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Patrick Perhaps someone in authority can track and kill, er, ban
Patrick this luser?
Which luser? The one who first thought it would be a good idea for
newspaper sites to have a mail this article to someone feature that
forges the sender
So how did this newspaper server end up with NANOG posting rights
anyway???
Chuck Church
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew - Supernews
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 9:51 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Very funny: While
So, if you email friends in China from a Yahoo account, you have been
warned!
What makes you think that gmail.com, mail.ru or
your-isp.net is any different? Trust in human
nature, perhaps?
Every company has to obey the laws of the jurisdictions
in which they do business, and for
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Apologies to the 'dawg..
perhaps those responsible would stop, its not very amusing
It would have been slightly more amusing if they'd been from Faul
Perguson. At least that way it would have been totally clear it was
spoof/forgery. I almost
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Perhaps someone in authority can track and kill, er, ban this luser?
The challenge with this is doing a traceback of the requesting IP that
requested the article to be sent.
Best practice would be to include the requesting IP (i.e. the one which
On 7-Sep-2005, at 17:09, Church, Chuck wrote:
So how did this newspaper server end up with NANOG posting rights
anyway???
Servers don't get posting rights. From: headers get posting rights.
Even if the sending server is in a different domain that the users's
reply-to address?
s48.tribuneinteractive.com != netzero.net
(Keep in mind I'm not a mail admin, nor do I play one on TV...)
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Joe Abley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
On Sep 7, 2005, at 9:50 AM, Andrew - Supernews wrote:
Patrick == Patrick W Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Patrick Perhaps someone in authority can track and kill, er, ban
Patrick this luser?
Which luser? The one who first thought it would be a good idea for
newspaper sites to have a
On Sep 7, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Church, Chuck wrote:
Even if the sending server is in a different domain that the users's
reply-to address?
s48.tribuneinteractive.com != netzero.net
(Keep in mind I'm not a mail admin, nor do I play one on TV...)
Yes. People are taught to use their local
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Church, Chuck wrote:
Even if the sending server is in a different domain that the users's
reply-to address?
s48.tribuneinteractive.com != netzero.net
This is what SPF and friends are supposed to do. But they are not a
panacea (not intended
://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050907-auth_proxy.shtml.
Affected Products
=
Vulnerable Products
+--
Devices that are running the following release trains of Cisco IOS are
affected if Firewall Authentication Proxy for FTP and/or Telnet
Sessions is configured
However, clearly, companies doing business in China under this set of
rules are placing profits ahead of human rights. I, for one, will avoid
patronizing any organization I know to be engaged in such practices.
Owen
pgpnvudC9baJQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I've been talking to ARIN about the rwhois setup on our SWIPped blocks, and
there appears to be a problem with the standard output from whois.arin.net. The
two rwhois clients I've tried are rwhois and jwhois. The rwhois client behavior
is something like this:
1. Query whois.arin.net.
2a. If the
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:10:12PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every company has to obey the laws of the jurisdictions
in which they do business, and for international
companies, that list of jurisdictions can be very,
very long.
Obeying the (local) law is, in most cases, very
Two comments.
soapbox
First, it's everyone's responsibility to do what's necessary
to prevent their operation from being an abuse source, vector,
or support service. That includes registrars, web hosts, DNS
providers, email services, consumer ISPs, webmail services,
corporations, end-users --
On Sep 7, 2005, at 3:59 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:10:12PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every company has to obey the laws of the jurisdictions
in which they do business, and for international
companies, that list of jurisdictions can be very,
very long.
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:54:03AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
However, clearly, companies doing business in China under this set of
rules are placing profits ahead of human rights. I, for one, will avoid
patronizing any organization I know to be engaged in such practices.
Owen
There has
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 04:05:48PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Sep 7, 2005, at 3:59 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:10:12PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every company has to obey the laws of the jurisdictions
in which they do business, and for international
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
So, let's do the logic, as this is a simple schoolchild exercise.
[snip]
Therefore, if one is in mainland China to do business, then one does not
have a conscience or a spine.
It is probably that one does not have a conscience, is insane and does
uh... the guy hit a telephone pole.. may have caused an outage.
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3 men die in weekend crashes
While tragic, how is this even *remotely* on-topic for this
Hi nanog @2005.09.06_23:43:57_GMT+0200
When we wanted some of our own IP space at the end of last year, we looked
at the rwhois server that ARIN recommended and soon realised that it was a
useless piece of software. SWIP was simply not an option.
We
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 08:54:21AM -0400, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3 men die in weekend crashes
While tragic, how is this even *remotely* on-topic for this list?
jms
Look at the headers - this is
Personally, I see doing business in China about as logical as, say, giving
430 6th graders laptops with Internet access, and expecting them to pay
attention in the classroom... Oh, and cutting the sports programs to
afford those laptops. Man, if someone had given me a laptop in 6th grade,
I
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Albert Meyer wrote:
1. Does anyone agree that the present lack of rwhois server information in the
initial WHOIS response for SWIPped blocks is a problem?
I think the real problem here is that jwhois is preferring ARIN's whois
service rather than their rwhois service,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:07:41AM +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
Personally, I see doing business in China about as logical as, say, giving
430 6th graders laptops with Internet access, and expecting them to pay
attention in the classroom... Oh, and cutting the sports programs to
afford those
I should add that my original statement pertains to (obviously) the Chinese
*government* alone! I am concerned about the repression that the Chinese
people experience, and the basic freedoms that they lack.
As far as 'China hate' is concerned- this definately doesn't apply to me-
many of
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Albert Meyer wrote:
I've been talking to ARIN about the rwhois setup on our SWIPped blocks, and
there appears to be a problem with the standard output from whois.arin.net.
Be carefull about using word standard, there is no standard output for
whois plus both for ARIN and
On 08/09/05, william(at)elan.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be carefull about using word standard, there is no standard output for
whois plus both for ARIN and other RIRs output depends on the options used
when queries. In this case, I think you wanted to say that the problem you
see is with
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 17:38:17 EDT, Joseph S D Yao said:
I do hate the lack of respect for human rights shown by the mainland
Chinese government, and the slave labor prisons otherwise known as
cheap labor. And the lack of self-respect that allows others to turn
a blind eye to this for their
Bob Arthurs wrote:
I should add that my original statement pertains to (obviously) the
Chinese *government* alone! I am concerned about the repression that the
Chinese people experience, and the basic freedoms that they lack.
As far as 'China hate' is concerned- this definately doesn't
Katria network help about the Wireless side is at http://www.wispa.org/
and more pointedly at http://katrina.cnt.org/wordpress/
Hope this helps,
-Dee
46 matches
Mail list logo
