Martin Hannigan wrote:
Another interesting point is that GoDaddy charged a $199
reconnect fee. They punished the operator for the behavoir of their
customers.
Which is, IMHO, *sometimes* appropriate and sometimes not.
I hear that the victim of the disconnection actually was a bit of a spam
Sean Donelan wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Gadi Evron wrote:
"Even so, 300,000 infected users worldwide is not a terribly large
amount when compared to previous worms like Sober or Mydoom. However,
with this worm it isn't the quantity of infected users, it is the
destructive payload which is mos
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> certified validation of prefix ownership (and path, as has been
>> pointed out) would be great. it's clearly a laudable goal and seemed
>> like the right way to go. but right now, no one is doing it. the
>> rfcs that's i've fou
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Gadi Evron wrote:
> > "Even so, 300,000 infected users worldwide is not a terribly large
> > amount when compared to previous worms like Sober or Mydoom. However,
> > with this worm it isn't the quantity of infected users, it is the
> > destructive payload which is mos
>
>
>
> I'm not sure how on-topic this is/was, but considering long thread
> and different opinions that were expressed before, I believe some
> here may want to have additional information I recently read:
> http://www.emailbattles.com/archive/battles/phish_aacgebeeje_hc/
>
> The article au
