On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Drew Weaver wrote:
Is it a fairly normal practice for large companies such as Yahoo!
And Mozilla to send icmp/ping packets to DNS servers? If so, why? And a
related question would be from a service provider standpoint is there
any reason to deny ICMP/PING packets to
Gert Doering wrote:
> Does the policy really permit /40.../47 assignments?
http://www.arin.net/registration/guidelines/ipv6_assignment.html#step2
--
If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> Someone's possesion of a domain name contining a string you have a
> trademark on *in one specific line of business* *does not constitute an
> infringement of your trademark*.
>
> Unless they *use it* *in conjunction with a product or service name*
> *in the appropriate
David Ulevitch wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2006, at 6:18 AM, Jim Mercer wrote:
>
>> the company i'm working for has a growing list of domains for the company
>> and its trademarks.
>>
>> are there resellers out there that have agreements with _most_ TLD
>> registries?
>>
>> i realize that i won't l
Fred Baker wrote:
> Now, as to ccTLDs vs gTLDs, if anyone wants to eliminate one or the
> other they get my vote.
The political reality is that ccTLDs will never go away. The business
reality is that gTLDs (at least the majority of the ones we have now) will
never go away. So, can we move on to
Sean Donelan wrote:
> Should content suppliers be required to provide equal access to all
> networks? Or can content suppliers enter into exclusive contracts?
SBC and Yahoo! have already answered this question (for example).
I also think that most people on this list will remember the early day
Crist Clark wrote:
>
> We got some very weird compaints about applications "hanging." Tracked
> it down to reverse lookups timing out. Reverse lookups to RFC1918 space.
> Looks like the IANA blackhole servers for RFC1918 are not well?
>From my location (Comcast cable modem in LA) I can see the I
ast-address-assignments>
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFC11HbwtDPyTesBYwRAhQTAJ9zNSoAfkApywj1GnaV4mQRx7yNRQCfVWQW
Up/pBqgT/VgF5tZn0X/E1zE=
=BWO4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
ess-assignments>
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFCzvPowtDPyTesBYwRAlciAKCeR86MJyCmtjbP/MxviXIM6yT8ugCeL9XJ
vPlR8n8sUyDaEEnsXIFm5zE=
=/Kd+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
three (3) IPv4 /8 blocks to RIPE NCC:
89/8
90/8
91/8
For a full list of IANA IPv4 allocations please see:
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space>
- -
:
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space>
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFCs2C8wtDPyTesBYwRAscHAKCQEWrG96z/1FmhZWl1Mrt13hzBngCeNUCF
SldR9Wbc4WTNoLoI7dJlKJc=
=cq00
-E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
block of AS Numbers to APNIC:
37888-38911
For a full list of IANA AS Number allocations please see
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers>
- --
Doug Barton
G
ast-address-assignments>
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFCkm/+wtDPyTesBYwRAoF2AKCauGLNaAEcyvyCEH5S2ev1KuDH/ACfakit
cJ3TQ6O4MiYq9mb2L/JaAC0=
=mJiE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
So, like ICANN, governements and big corporations are represented at
the ITU. Like ICANN, ordinary users are excluded.
I think groups like the Non-Commercial Users Constituency
(http://gnso.icann.org/non-commercial/) and the At Large Advisory Committee
(http://alac.ican
:::/22ARIN
2608:::/22ARIN
260C:::/22ARIN
For a full list of IANA IPv6 allocations please see:
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments>
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whether Karl is in fact right or a raving net.loon, there is indeed something
very
wrong with the process if he's 25% of the input.
It may be useful to keep in mind that this is the tail end of a long process
that we're talking about here. There was already a lot of discu
Jeroen Massar wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 23:42 -0300, Doug Barton wrote:
This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
one (1) IPv4 /8 block to AfriNIC:
41/8 AfriNIC
Would you (read: IANA) also be so kind and give them a nice chunk out
of:
http://www.iana.org/assignments
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
block of AS Numbers to AfriNIC:
36864 - 37887
For a full list of IANA AS Number allocations please see
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers>
- --
Doug Barton
G
first allocation to AfriNIC after their recent recognition as a
Regional Internet Registry. The ICANN staff would like to offer its
congratulations to AfriNIC for this significant achievement.
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
V
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
This is to inform you that the IANA allocated the following
IPv4 /8 block to ARIN on 30 March 2005:
73/8ARIN
For a full list of IANA IPv4 allocations please see:
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space>
- --
Doug
it will present its preliminary results and recommendations from
> its review of the incident.
That agenda has now been updated. As I understand it, the final version of
the agenda had to wait on some coordination with the local host, which has
now been completed.
FYI,
Doug
- --
Doug Bart
ess-space>
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFB+UfKwtDPyTesBYwRAiFLAJwPunYfqYEZzru+Zhpo3Tzf0kF75QCgoN14
OXCHaZBmTrtvRdSRjxt9VZQ=
=KaeV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
pv6-tla-assignments>
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFB5aL5wtDPyTesBYwRAm4zAJ9a/3st27eUsCQeD2WKIoL8QVNA5gCfWc9F
eHLYn34mS0qj3IhwU2woMLU=
=qS1+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
nts>
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBwNAhyIakK9Wy8PsRAtXyAJ4t1M6cQC/137a8+e5Zhv3juJUTOwCg5Mq0
6tyjLHMDph1d+vRKSgBtJio=
=miYo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
ttp://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-tla-assignments>
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBq7nryIakK9Wy8PsRAkXKAKDt5e51TRqDOP04sSgvN76NyrIlWACg5hcV
e+9tLEhXv99J5t9l9eY2kMg=
=SODE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
RIPE NCC
2001:5A00::/23RIPE NCC
2001:5C00::/23RIPE NCC
2001:5E00::/23RIPE NCC
For a full list of IANA IPv6 allocations please see:
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-tla-assignments>
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
one (1) IPv6 /23 block to ARIN:
2001:4800::/23ARIN
For a full list of IANA IPv6 allocations please see:
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-tla-assignments>
- -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Doug Barton wrote:
For a full list of IANA IPv4 allocations please see:
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space>
This would have been more useful if I had copied and pasted from the
right message, sorry:
For a ful
ace>
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBIVY/wtDPyTesBYwRAi8/AJ44TNst0AM4xqOHDXZcmo+rCqOP1QCbBR0g
zhtl1VzZ7/2W7luxyN/b/NU=
=5pBC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
full list of IANA IPv4 allocations please see:
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space>
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBDuAYwtDPyTesBYwRAq9aAJ99l6Pib51qvGRgYuPam+jFv/TBOg
eing sent to the following
communities:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Doug
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAykOQwtDPy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
block of AS Numbers to ARIN:
32768 - 33791
For a full list of IANA AS Number allocations please see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is to inform you that the IANA has allocated the following
IPv6 /23 block to ARIN:
2001:3C00::/23 ARIN
For a full list of IANA IPv6 allocations please see:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-tla-assignments
- --
Doug Barton
General
a sign of good faith
in our dealings with the RIRs.
Hope this helps,
Doug
- --
Doug Barton
General Manager, Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAnLSWwtDPyTesBYwRAne4AJ0Rvv5NldNaQqkQk8Erc2AoRfLDhgCeIRyi
qoCOvUJRzE77u4WSqkNr5AI=
=vmPW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
home page, and deleted some less frequently
used ones.
Please take a look at http://www.iana.org/ and let me know what you
think. We have more improvements planned for the IANA site down the road
as resources become available, but in the short term I think these
changes will help.
Doug
--
Doug B
you please fix that? thanks.
Good idea. I had that in mind along with some other changes for later
this quarter, but given the amount of attention this topic is
generating, I'll try to get something up asap.
Thanks,
Doug
--
Doug Barton
General Manager, The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Roger Marquis wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Doug Barton wrote:
> > >
> > There's already been a lot of discussion about why this is a good thing,
> > so I won't reiterate it all.
>
> Thanks Doug. Are those discussions available on
it other than logging it, so we wouldn't miss it
if it went away. :)
Hopefully this information is useful. If you have any further questions,
please feel free to contact me.
Doug
--
Doug Barton
General Manager, Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
ests to the proper channels,
so if it's actually something significant, don't hesitate to mail them.
Doug
--
Doug Barton, Yahoo! DNS Administration and Development
"You like pain? Try wearing a corset!"
Keira Knightley as Elizabeth Swann, in
"Pirates Of The Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl"
input on
this topic, and your very helpful suggestions were incorporated in the
final product. On behalf of the Committee, I'd like to thank you for
these contributions, and encourage you to continue sending comments and
suggestions regarding operational or security issues.
Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.icann.org/announcements/advisory-19sep03.htm
Folks,
In regards to the statement above, the Security and Stability Advisory
Committee is sincerely interested in your feedback regarding this i
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Todd Vierling wrote:
> (Although I noticed that NetBSD's pkgsrc version of bind9 doesn't install
> the HTML docs, which are now required in order to understand named.conf
> changes. I'll probably submit a change request for that.)
FreeBSD's does. :)
Doug (aka [EMAIL PROTEC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm speaking officially only for myself here, although my opinion is
informed by the fire drill at work today. :)
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Rodney Joffe wrote:
> During the root zone (.) update later today, specifically with root
> zone serial number 2003
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Sure, it won't happen in 30 minutes, but, I don't understand why this
> wasn't started when F-Secure first noticed the situation.
I seriously doubt that most (any?) ISP would be willing to accept the
legal liability for altering anything on the computer
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, E.B. Dreger wrote:
> The suggestion is to move ALL root, and as many TLD as possible,
> servers into the new space. Nobody has said "move one or two",
> which indeed would be ineffective.
Ah, sorry, I wasn't aware of the full extent of your crack-smoking-ness.
:) You'll nev
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, E.B. Dreger wrote:
>
> JSW> Date: 10 Mar 2003 15:23:52 -0500
> JSW> From: Jeff S Wheeler
>
>
> JSW> I repeat my suggestion that a number of DNS root-servers or
> JSW> gtld-servers be renumbered into 69/8 space. If the DNS
> JSW> "breaks" for these neglected networks, I suspe
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, E.B. Dreger wrote:
> BB> Recent versions of un*x BIND will pick a random port above
> BB> 1024 for udp conversations. It can and has picked 1434.
>
> Standard socket(2) behavior. BIND [hopefully] runs chown(2)ed,
> so the source port number must be >= 1024.
At startup, name
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> It looks like all hell is breaking loose on some of the nations
> backbones. http://www.internethealthreport.com
>
> The port counters on my AT&T DS3 were reading in the 250 megabit range,
> that is a DS3, mind you.
>
> Any sour
y
accurate. At least, the entry for .af gives you a few more e-mail
addresses to try, and some phone numbers. Also, if you find that the
information there is not up to date, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is generally
appreciative of your feedback.
Hope this helps.
--
Doug Barton, Yahoo! DNS Adm
pefully) not something gone wacky on our end. Do you
have access to a command line somewhere that you can run dig from? If so,
please mail me privately and we can try to work out what's going on.
Doug Barton
Yahoo! DNS Administration
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Simon Waters wrote:
> Last time it was discussed I thought that the provisions already
> in the DNS RFC's to allow zone transfer for "." to recursive
> servers is a neat solution for the root zone.
There are pluses and minuses to that approach. The people at .biz and
.info a
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> Ok, but how do you generate megabits worth of traffic for which there is
> no return traffic? At some level, someone or something must be trying to
> do something _really hard_ but keep failing every time. It just doesn't
> make sense.
I could s
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Bodie Francis wrote:
> I am sure Doug and others could use this to reduce the typing (the reason
> Unix was invented) when doing recursive queries for delegations (it even
> identifies lame delegations quite nicely.)
Sorry if I wasn't clear. My example was intended to be ped
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, John Neiberger wrote:
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped me out and I hope you don't mind
> me making a fool of myself. :-) I (and others that I work
> with) learned quite a lot from your responses to this little
> incident. If I have to be a little bit foolish to learn
> s
Blake Fithen wrote:
>>Brad Knowles:
>> The Pentagon has windows. It also has an ancient system of air
>>pipes aimed at all of the windows...
>
>
>
>
> Is this sensitive info?
Given that I saw this on the history channel the other night, I'd s
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Gary E. Miller wrote:
>
> Yo Martin!
>
> If there is plenty of power in CA then howcum there was a "stage 2" alert
> yesterday and a "market alert today"? Today's "projected demand" equaled
> "available resources" today If demand played out as expected there
> would have b
N etc..) in order to be able to guarantee
> delivery and lower the risk of email that's been requested by an
> end user being mistakenly blackholed or treated as spam by their
> ISP (or webmail provider).
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/spam/spam-17.html
--
Doug Barton, Yahoo! DN
advice of some windows experts on whether this would break things.
It's been in place for about 6 months now, and so far we haven't heard a
single complaint. The only problem this ever causes is when registering
domains through certain ccTLD registries that require MNAME to be one of
the s
58 matches
Mail list logo
