t add
anything useful to the debate.
- Original Message -
From: "Warren Kumari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx do
What are they talking about? .XXX already exists:
%dig ns xxx @g.public-root.com
; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> ns xxx @g.public-root.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY:
"Daniel Golding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'william(at)elan.net'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'John Palmer (NANOG Acct)'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'nanog'"
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 3:58 PM
Subject: RE: Go
Google Adsense has been down for several hours now. This is the interface that
partners use to manage
their advertising settings.
Does anyone know if there is anything left of Network Access
Solutions (NASC.OB)?
I know DSL.NET bought their DSL customer base, but are they
still around doing something else?
No, why don't you stop insulting people, Niels. You attack Peter because
of his involvment in the Inclusive Namespace. FYI: Public root servers
are online and available. Maybe the h-root ops should ask the P-R technical
committee for assistance if they cannot keep their servers up.
- Original
- Original Message -
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "NANOG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 4:35 PM
Subject: FW: Verizon outage in Southern California?
>507 E LEW is holding the most switching gear is likely
>a t
>
> Is your problem that it takes X months/years to get a new TLD put into the
> normal ICANN Root system? Or is it that you don't like their choice of
> .com and want .common (or some other .com replacement?). There is a
> process defined to handle adding new TLD's, I think it's even documented
Nice try, but the location that I was trying from did not use "alternative root
servers".
FYI: They are "Inclusive Namespace Servers".
- Original Message -
From: "John Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: UNITED.CO
The United Airlines website appears to be down and has been
down for days.
Is this a network issue or are they out of
business??
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/ThinGuy?entry=the_war_on_terror_as
>From their press release at
http://www.tiscali.com/press/releases/10552825f1a.html
"... As a result of this agreement, Tiscali will offer to its subscribers
across Europe the access to the entire World Wide Web,
including the new alternative domain names. The agreement underscores Tiscali's
c
FYI: The IP address of the mail server that sends out NANOG
list messages
(198.108.1.26) is once again on most of the major RBLs.
. There is a large piece of the world that doesn't
want ICANN to be the authority.
No public RSN that cares about its credibility will create collisions.
- Original Message -
From: "william(at)elan.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)"
- Original Message -
From: "Todd Vierling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jay R. Ashworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: The whole alternate-root ${STATE}horse
>
> On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
>
> > I'm going to dive in one more
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: The whole alternate-root ${STATE}horse
>
> I didnt realise it was tha
an emotional and
religious position. It is not helpful to introduce emotion and religion into
a technical debate about such an important topic. I ditto Karl's point about
this sounding like the telco execs in the early 1970's.
> --
> -- Todd Vierling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
John Palmer
I have the BIND source, its available to the public.
You want to know how hard it is? I'll show you. I will
write it. Thats what I do for a living.
I accept your challenge. See you in six months.
FYI: I don't speak for anyone but myself and ADNS/American Webmasters.
- Original Message ---
ICANN has no right to claim that they are the authority for the namespace.
They are NOT. Also note the word PUBLIC in PUBLIC-ROOT.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joe Shen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "NANGO"
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 200
Already entire nations are dropping ICANN. China for one and now
Turkey.
Istanbul, June 23, 2005
A Top Level Domain (TLD) system has been launched in Turkey as the result of an
alliance between the Turkish Informatics Association
(TBD) and Unified Identity Technology (UNIDT), officials announc
How about supporting alternatives to ICANN, which are getting
more and more widespread and accepted like www.public-root.com
and www.inaic.com ?
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rodney Joffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; <[EMAIL
You do know that I was joking, don't you??
Sorry, I didn't know that NANOG has a humor filter on it.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Weeks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 16:26
Subject: Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)
>
>
>
> > This is to info
Thank you for that information. I can leave 41/8 in my router bogon list
and hopefully eliminate the Nigerian 419 problem somewhat.
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Barton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 21:42
Subject: New IANA IPv4 allocation t
Netblazers were fine except the Telebit lied about the SYN35 card
being usable with a T-1.
Bad terminal servers? How about overpriced ones like the USR Total
Control Hubs.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert E.Seastrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <[E
Please do not post links to sites that require registration. Some people
dont want to let marketers have their information and its rude to send links
that dont work anonymously.
- Original Message -
From: "Hank Nussbacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 9:33
Sub
They don't have a mailing list that is public yet. Might
be a good suggestion.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots?
>
> On 16 Jan 2005 at 15:52, John Palmer (
See http://www.public-root.com for an alternative to the ICANN monopoly.
Those folks are very concerned with security.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots?
>
> On 16 Jan 2005 at 21:31,
Now the question is, can one easily block all of doubleclick.net by 127.0.0.1 in the
hosts file
on a wincrash box? They appear to have ad, ad2, ad3, m2, m3.doubleclick.net. Anyone
know
what hosts to list??? (ie: ad2, ad3 ... to ad???)
- Original Message -
From: "Henry Linneweh" <[EMAI
Can anyone identify this http exploit? Seen in the apache logs:
foo.bar.com
- - [30/May/2004:02:45:28 -0400] "SEARCH
/\x90\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\
x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x02\xb1\x0
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 13:16
Subject: Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site Finder" -- calls
>
> Måns Nilsson KTHNOC wrote:
>
> > --On Monday, February 23, 2004 12:43:40 -0600 John Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Could someone from whoever owns CAIS Internet (AS3491) please
contact me offlist? One of your customers has a machine that is making
a lame attempt at a DDOS attack.
Although ineffectual, it is causing a slight uptick in bandwidth usage and
we need to get this stopped before I take it to your u
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Henry Linneweh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 12:59
Subject: Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm
On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:35:05 PST, Henry Linneweh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> Everyday th
In this case, it is the IDIOIT users. You tell them time and time again DONT CLICK ON
ATTACHMENTS
UNLESS SOMEONE YOU KNOW IS SENDING IT AND TELLS YOU IN ADVANCE THEY ARE
SENDING IT.
The problem is dumb users who DONT LISTEN. This is mostly the office crowd.
The real imbeciles are people operati
s-than-well-to-do countries. I will never stop
fighting against that kind of thing, nor will others
in this struggle.
There are many people who have been working against
this unacceptable state of affairs for many years, myself
included and I will not let you mis-characterize our
struggle.
I hate to see government get involved in anything, but perhaps
some law holding PC owners responsible for SPAM that comes
from their unpatched machines AS LONG AS there is ample
notification to that user that their machine is compromised.
Also, ISP's should be held responsible for allowing unpatc
What about 1/8 and 2/8? Are those being reserved for
something special
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Owen DeLong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 16:55
Subject: Re: New IPv4 Allocation to ARIN
>
>
> I don't know for cer
And then there are the upstreams that filter legacy /24's
Seen that too...
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick W.Gilmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Patrick Gilmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 15:13
Subject: Re: /24s run amuck
>
> On Jan
Its at http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mpsc_blackout_77423_7.pdf
- Original Message -
From: "daniel lance herrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:25
Subject: Re: Utility Mapping to be f
Anyone with half the brains can figure out how to cause trouble just by driving
down the street. You don't need any maps.
Also public information tells alot about things. The Michigan PUC just finished
their study of the August 14th blackout and has issued their report. In it it has
a section tha
Good question.
You know there are thousands of legacy /24's out there that were allocated by
IANA as /24's How can you aggregate them up if all you have is the /24?
To those who filter out /24's - how is this done - just by the netmask size?
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Christophe
Thanks for everyone's suggestions - I've found two apparently very good ones thanks
to others on the list.
John
- Original Message -
From: "Margie Arbon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
Are there any RBLs still out there that list cable modem, dialup and dsl IPs?
(anything dynamically assigned or home users)?
DIALUPS.MAIL-ABUSE.ORG does not seem to be functioning.
Looking for rack space in Chicago to house 2 - 2U servers, a cisco 3620, a hub and
flat panel/keyboard tray.
Will need net access and 8 ip addresses. Low bandwidth usage.
Contact me at user info at domain adns.net.
That may soon change. Seeing as how bad things are getting with VRSGN and ICANN
resources are being lined up to solve this problem once and for all.
- Original Message -
From: "Haesu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Vixie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 21,
Thats to prevent it from being disconnected accidentally
(or for any other reason :->)
When I get my hands on one of those, I clip off the hood
with a pair of manicure scissors.
- Original Message -
From: "Gerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Daryl G. Jurbala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "nano
It may be unclear who they are supposed to represent, but they
do the bidding of their funders. I'm going to go out on a limb
here and postulate that their decisions, therefore, are not
always in the best interests of the Internet Community.
- Original Message -
From: "David Schwartz"
Don't know, but I cannot get to the VSGN wildcard site. DNS is still returning the IP,
but port 80
is not responding or is very slow. Bet they didn't allocate enough servers to this
(hehehehe) or
its being DOS'ed.
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Hayes Merritt, III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is one solution - replace all of your root.cache files with:
(root) nameserver = C.ROOT-SERVERS.ORSC
(root) nameserver = D.ROOT-SERVERS.ORSC
(root) nameserver = E.ROOT-SERVERS.ORSC
(root) nameserver = F.ROOT-SERVERS.ORSC
(root) nameserver = H.ROOT-SERVERS.ORSC
(root) nameserver = I.ROO
This is just another example of a virtual monopoly doing whatever them
damn well please because THEY CAN.
Sorry to sound like a broken record, but we in the Inclusive Namespace
have been saying this all along.
How about a world with 1000's of TLDs all operated by different people
with NO re
I have RCN cable internet in Chicago and they recently implemented
blocking port 25 access outbound. They say that we should just use
their mail servers instead.
I connect with my laptop from 3 or 4 locations to drop off mail to
my servers. I cannot use their mail servers from other locations ot
- Original Message -
From: "David Lesher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "nanog list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:22
Subject: Re: Fun new policy at AOL
>
> Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
> >
> >
> > > Shouldn't customers that purchase
>
> SMTP & DNS should be run through the servers provided by the ISP for
> the exact purpose. There is no valid reason for a dialup customer to
^ OH YES THERE IS
(at least to a different resolver other than yours)
> go direct to root
I hear that Level 3 is good but do they handle small stuff like T-1?
We may be looking to dual-home soon and will be looking around.
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Crandall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Rick Ernst'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 200
Hey - they aren't supposed to be using their work e-mail for stuff
other than work - especially in a banking environment.
I would be unhappy if my bank did not exclude executables from
outside e-mail.
Again, ITS YOUR EMPLOYERS NETWORK, NOT YOURS.
- Original Message -
From: "Gary E. M
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Israel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "McBurnett, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jack Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Mans Nilsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 12:00
Subject: RE: Port blocking last resort in fight agains
45 seconds:
deny tcp any any eq 135 (5445 matches)
deny tcp any any eq 137
deny tcp any any eq 138
deny tcp any any eq 139
deny tcp any any eq 445 (207 matches)
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August
When the RFC's are broken, then what do you do?
RFC's are to be followed if one can operate one's network
under those constraints. Often times, RFC's don't take into
account real world considerations.
For instance: The "rule" that there should be only one root
server network does not provide a s
Cannot get to sites on AT&T Canada - Any news regarding the problem cause?
Got this in my mailbox this afternoon - The URL
goes to swiftSpay.com, not swiftpay.com.
You're probably aware of this scam - if not, now
you know.
John P.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 2:49 PM
Subject: Transacti
MAI will be offering IPV6 for their web services hosting.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard A Steenbergen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jared Mauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Irwin Lazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 14:16
Subject: Re: IPv6
>
> On
Speaking of that, has 7/8 been allocated? Doesn't show it on IANA's list but
I saw several routes come in (7.1/16 comes to mind) a few days ago.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 12:36
Subject: 69/8 revisited
>
> I've
Hmm - don't think so - although nothing is up there - www.aljazeera.net resolves to
127.0.0.1.
This is from the MYDOMAIN.COM nameservers listed as the auth for this domain:
; <<>> DiG 8.2 <<>> ns aljazeera.net @b.gtld-servers.net
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; g
Here is my reply to Joe
Your solution is good. In general, anyone worried about this kind of invasion of
privacy
should arrange to run their own root servers. The more the merrier. This is not
neccessarily
about having multiple roots with colliding TLDs, but about security from surveillance.
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Baptista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 09:41
Subject: IPv6 Interview Questions and critic
>
>
> Hi:
>
> I'm doing an article on IPv6 and am looking for comments - here is a
> portion on IPv6 which relates to
Yes - DSHEILD has our ORSC root server listed as well. I thought that was hilarious.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Sprickman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Johannes Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 2:36 AM
Subject: Re: Bogon list or Dsh
Oh goodie - now maybe my BUY order for 50,000 shares at $0.01 will
execute. :->
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Workman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 8:23 PM
Subject: Act Surprised.
>
> http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/020721/worldcom_bankrupt
Is this the same vulnerability that
was corrected with the 1.3.26 apache release?
ROTECTED]>
To: "John Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in ATT attachments. Its annoying
and no one can see your message
> John,
>
> use a real MUA and you will have no problem. Someth
I know this is off the current subject., but some of you are sending
these e-mail's to the list that appear as attachments and not text.
This is even more annoying than HTML Mail.
The message appears with an empty body and attachments that have
names that start with ATT
This is annoying.
Sorry Paul, I guess you don't understand how those TLDTAG records
work.
Its no joke.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Vixie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: Name Server Change-over completed
>
> > Hmm.. surely emailing e
ATTENTION ALL INCLUSIVE NAMESPACE ROOT SERVER ZONE MANAGERS:
The gTLD name server cutovers listed below have been completed. Please update your
root zones asap.
For info, questions, please contact ADNS NOC at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Palmer
Begin announcement
IMPORTANT NOTICE
Not sure, but FoxNews.COM is on that space and it has been un-reachable
pretty
much all day.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Granados" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:05 PM
Subject: DDos attack in progress?
>
> Does anyone know anything abo
I find it interesting that the collider versions of BIZ and INFO (ie the
ICANN sanctioned ones) dont even show up on the "Number of Hosts by TLD"
section under this report.
Poetic justice perhaps?
- Original Message -
From: "jeffrey arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Micah" <[EMAIL PROTEC
Update - it appears to be either NAS or COVAD that has melted down on the
East coast. It seems to
be affecting here as well. They even have a message on their customer
service line.
Is there some sort of a router meltdown somewhere this evening? I cant get
through to most
destinations, either with TELNET, http, ftp, DNS - nothing.
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 4:42 PM
To: John Palmer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Trying to find a connectivity provider that wont go under
(was RE: CAIS/Ardent and now Network Access Solutions)
> Who can one rely on for connectivity? In general and in the Detroit
area?
, not because of bandwidth needs, but
for reliability's sake.
John
On Thu, 30 May 2002, John Palmer wrote:
> CAIS sold our account to NAS. They did this about 5 months back. They are
NAS has been nothing but trouble. We are (or were) a Covad reseller, first
direct through Covad, then throu
CAIS sold our account to NAS. They did this about 5 months back. They are
just now getting around to cutting us over. This involves Covad making some
changes in their switch somewhere.
Back last May, it was PSINet that was selling our account to CAIS. They sent
us an e-mail to announce that they
Posted a message several times and it never made it out
Is the list broken?
Typical - NAS took over our account from ARDENT and did the cutover today.
They botched it up. Our routes are not being announced. If you are out there
please contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Proposal #1 (which passed by over 2/3rds - 67.9%) expresses the sense of the
GA that
DOC should re-bid the ICANN contract and forget ICANN completely
Proposal #2 (which passed by 75%) expresses to ICANN the desire that they
reform in a meaningful way, and if they don't, that the DOC should repla
DNSO General Assembly
RESULTS of vote on Two motions about ICANN Reform, May 2002
23 May 2002
RESULTS of vote on Two motions about ICANN Reform, May 2002
Re: b12
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/2002.GA-ICANN-Reform-motions.html
Fundamentals - Two R
Anyone see anything strange with AS 3491 today? They have been dropping our routes on
and off all day
long?
Looks like www.gov.ps is offline. Wasn't someone in Norway operating a
backup site
for this? IP address resoves to 212.14.253.243 which is not routed at this
time.
-
AGN Domain Name Services, Inc http://www.adns.net
Since 1995. The Registry for .AMERICA, .EARTH, .LION, .USA and .Z
Define yo
Is anyone aware of the significance of the domain dns-o.net in China.
I just registered this domain for another purpose and pointed it to an
empty website for now and the log file is full of what appear to be requests
for random URLs (mostly for banners .gifs, etc). I'm just curious if anyone
kno
85 matches
Mail list logo
