On Nov 4, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
"Could you be any less descriptive of the problem you are seeing?"
the internet is broken. anyone know why?
Did you ping it?
is that what broke it?
Please. That's how you *know* it's broken.
On Nov 4, 2006, at 7:45 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Chris L. Morrow wrote:
"Could you be any less descriptive of the problem you are seeing?"
the internet is broken. anyone know why?
Did you ping it?
Mike
> From: Aaron Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:52:46 -0800
> To: 'nanog list'
> Subject: 3rd Party Cisco CWDM GBICs?
>
>
> Hi List,
>
> Cisco currently provides 8 lambdas for CWDM and we have a 10 lambda
> mux/de-mux system we want to make use of over a single fibre (5 da
> From: "Warren Kumari, Ph.D, CCIE# 9190" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:14:38 -0500
> To:
> Subject: Re: The Cidr Report
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Feb 13, 2005, at 2:31 AM, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 12 Feb 2005,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexei Roudnev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 12:53 AM
> To: Michael Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Open-Source Network Management Tools
>
> I alwa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I'm looking for open-source alternatives for network management,
> such as Nagios or Big Brother. We are currently using WhatsUp Gold,
> and would like to move to something more flexible (and not running
> on a Windows platform). Something that ha
ginal Message-
> From: Sam Stickland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 3:28 AM
> To: Michael Smith
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: 802.17 RPR and L2 Ethernet interoperablity (Ethernet
> over RPR)
>
> Thanks for the reply. Pretty much ev
Hello:
I think this is pretty provider-specific. However, we are doing this
right now with a particular vendor using their flavor of RPR. The ring
uses Q in Q tunneling in the core and all switches communicate directly
to one another using .1Q encapsulated frames.
Mike
> -Original Messa
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Mikael Abrahamsson
> Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 10:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point
speed
> publicly available?]
>
>
> On Sat, 3
above that DWDM is your only option, and a hell of a
lot
> >>more expensive.
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>
> >>--
> >>---
> >>Erik Haagsman
> >>Network Architect
> >>We Dare BV
> >>tel: +31(0)10 7507008
> >&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All:
I'm wondering if anyone has seen a good and cheap(er) solution for
providing multiple Gigabit Ethernet circuits over single pair of
fiber. I'm looking for a way to do CWDM or DWDM that's cheaper than
putting in a Cisco 15454 or 15327.
#x27;m not sure if it's
appropriate, generally speaking.
If other operators would like to reply directly to me I would be more
than happy to summarize to the list. Thank you for any assistance you
can provide.
Michael Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the record... I have first hand knowledge that KSA's filtering is
not too effective.
I'll abstain from the ethics/moral discussion.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Vadim Antonov
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 8:35 PM
To: Randy Bush
IN Public Policy
>Mailing List (PPML) and voice your opinion.
>
>http://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/index.html
>
>Forrest
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: H. Michael Smith, Jr. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:24 PM
>To:&
Even if they understand it, why should they accept it? If an ISP
assigns an address block, runs BGP with the customer, promotes
multi-homing, shouldn't they make a reasonable effort to make it work?
Unless I am missing something, I am having a big problem with an ISP
assigning a /24 to a multi-h
ng that I am missing something here. If not, I sure hope
more folks don't adopt Verio's filtering techniques. (I know that a
VERY low AS # issues /24's out of a /8)
-Original Message-
From: Phil Rosenthal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 5:42 PM
T
What about the /24's that many ISPs (especially tier 2-3) are assigning
to multi-homed customers? What about an IX or "critical infrastructure
providers" that may be issued a /24 from ARIN (Policy 2001-3)?
Although it may be rare that a large aggregate would become unreachable
to a "large" net
Hello All,
A few months ago someone posted a URL to a tool that maps the Internet
from the perspective of any (inputted) AS Number. Could someone send
this URL (on- or off-list)?
I've searched the archives, but I cannot find it.
Thanks,
Michael
el
H. Michael Smith, Jr.
Network Services and Security Manager
Clark Atlanta University
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mike Donahue
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 2:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: AS announcement quest
One of my clients is currently a victim of an over-zealous ISP
recklessly trying to implement rpf.
One (of two) ISPs are trying to monitor my customer's circuit by
watching the serial interface (IP address) of the cpe (customer owned
and controlled) router (IP address is from ISP's block). Due
riginal Message-
From: Christopher L. Morrow [mailto:chris@;UU.NET]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:21 AM
To: H. Michael Smith, Jr.
Cc: 'Hank Nussbacher'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: no ip forged-source-address
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, H. Michael Smith, Jr. wrote:
A fundamental effect of spoofing addresses from your local subnet is
that when the packets reach their target, the source addresses are
meaningful. I realize that the traceability of these packets has
already been mentioned, but I want to point out the profound difference
between a DDoS attack wi
0:26 AM
To: fingers
Cc: H. Michael Smith, Jr.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks
I would point out that if we were to define it and provide the
definition to the proper authorities, it would go a long way towards
getting a definition that makes sense.
I, (and many oth
.
-Original Message-
From: fingers [mailto:fingers@;fingers.co.za]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:04 AM
To: H. Michael Smith, Jr.
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks
> Source address verification at access layer and rate limiting icmp
would
> be fine starts.
Source address verification at access layer and rate limiting icmp would
be fine starts.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-nanog@;merit.edu] On Behalf Of
fingers
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 1:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks
On 7/24/02 11:31 AM, "Adam Rothschild" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2002-07-24-14:10:00, James Thomason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If this legislation is passed, they certainly will earn Null0 on
>> mine.
>
> Unless, of course, the RIAA, MPAA, and friends carry out their
> cracking thr
Hello All.
Can anyone suggest tools to use for gathering statistics for billing
purposes? I would like to know what tools are most common among ISPs.
Thanks,
Michael
<>
27 matches
Mail list logo
