Marshall Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thought this would be considered on-topic as guess who would have
to clean up the resulting messes...
The courts. There is no possible way that this bill (as I
read it) could, in any way, be conceived as even remotely
constitutional. This is pure
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 10:48:36 EDT, Petr Swedock said:
The courts. There is no possible way that this bill (as I
read it) could, in any way, be conceived as even remotely
constitutional. This is pure vigilante: the entertainment
The fact that a law is unconstitutional on the face of it has
I would argue that my home computer is the repository of my papers
and effects. No place in the below law does it limit the restriction
to the government only. Indeed any law passed giving sanction to any
party having the right IMHO is in direct violation of both the spiret
and the letter of the
-
From: Joseph T. Klein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:16 PM
To: Marshall Eubanks; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Draft of Rep. Berman's bill authorizes anti-P2P hacking
I would argue that my home computer is the repository of my papers and
effects. No place
: Draft of Rep. Berman's bill authorizes anti-P2P hacking
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:11:00 PDT, Rowland, Alan D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
IANAL but IMHO spewing cracked copies of say, Photoshop, or other
copyright violations might be considered probable cause with the
specific place/things being
I had significant input in my life regarding the difference between can
and may. IMHO significant numbers of net citizens have forgotten that
difference.
therefore all of us need to give up our civil rights?
the terrorists have won.
randy
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 02:37:15PM -0700, Rowland, Alan D wrote:
I fully agree this is Not Good (TM), hence the BAD in my response. Having
said that, satellite providers periodically 'kill' hacked access cards on
equipment in the user's home with no legal ramifications. How would this be
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
I can't imagine they would actually follow through with this though, all
it takes is one incident where they cause financial harm to someone with
an mp3 they misidentify and their highground is gone. Then again, I can't
imagine congress being
Thought this would be considered on-topic as guess who would have
to clean up the resulting messes...
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
- Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FC: Draft of Rep. Berman's bill authorizes
PROTECTED]
Subject: FC: Draft of Rep. Berman's bill authorizes anti-P2P hacking
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 20:29:35 -0400
X-URL: http://www.mccullagh.org/
X-URL: Politech is at http://www.politechbot.com/
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-945923.html?tag=politech
Could
] -
From: Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FC: Draft of Rep. Berman's bill authorizes anti-P2P hacking
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 20:29:35 -0400
X-URL: http://www.mccullagh.org/
X-URL: Politech is at http://www.politechbot.com/
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-945923
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:10 PM
To: Marshall Eubanks
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Draft of Rep. Berman's bill authorizes anti-P2P hacking
Would malicious actions on the part of copyright holders violate the
AUP of most networks? Or are service providers more willing
On 2002-07-24-14:10:00, James Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this legislation is passed, they certainly will earn Null0 on
mine.
Unless, of course, the RIAA, MPAA, and friends carry out their
cracking through throw-away dial and DSL accounts, like they
purportedly use now to troll for
On 7/24/02 11:31 AM, Adam Rothschild [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2002-07-24-14:10:00, James Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this legislation is passed, they certainly will earn Null0 on
mine.
Unless, of course, the RIAA, MPAA, and friends carry out their
cracking through
network vs. receiving their
traffic.
Derek
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
James Thomason
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:10 PM
To: Marshall Eubanks
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Draft of Rep. Berman's bill authorizes anti-P2P hacking
The BSA is even flexing it's muscles here in the GWN.
http://www.istop.com/BSALetter.txt
Although they seem to have lots of money for scanning services and
lawyers, they expect ISPs to provide services (assisting them enforce
their copyrights) for free.
Ralph Doncaster
principal, IStop.com
16 matches
Mail list logo
