RE: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through particular routes

2005-11-02 Thread Hannigan, Martin
What's the netblock and ASN you already have? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Edward W. Ray Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:50 PM To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through particular

RE: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through particular routes

2005-11-02 Thread Edward W. Ray
BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through particular routes What's the netblock and ASN you already have? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Edward W. Ray Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:50 PM To: nanog@merit.edu Subject

RE: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through particular routes

2005-11-02 Thread John Dupuy
W. Ray; nanog@merit.edu Subject: RE: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through particular routes What's the netblock and ASN you already have? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Edward W. Ray Sent: Wednesday, November 02

Re: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through particular routes

2005-11-02 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 03:35:07PM -0600, John Dupuy wrote: There is nothing about a cable modem that would normally prevent a BGP session. Nor do all the intermediate routers need to support BGP (multi-hop BGP). However, direct connections are preferred. Your _real_ challenge is

Re: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through particular routes

2005-11-02 Thread Joe McGuckin
RAS, I have to admit that I'm guilty of using the phrase class C more or less interchangably with /24 - I suspect a lot of us still do that... On 11/2/05 2:22 PM, Richard A Steenbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 03:35:07PM -0600, John Dupuy wrote: There is nothing

Re: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through particular routes

2005-11-02 Thread Randy Bush
I have to admit that I'm guilty of using the phrase class C more or less interchangably with /24 - I suspect a lot of us still do that... well, now you can do it for /64s and class B can be /48s (or is it /56s?) and class A can be /32s we have all been here before -- csny except i guess

Re: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through particular routes

2005-11-02 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 03:21:15PM -0800, Joe McGuckin wrote: RAS, I have to admit that I'm guilty of using the phrase class C more or less interchangably with /24 - I suspect a lot of us still do that... Well, on behalf of the entire networking community, I hereby ask you to stop it. :)

Re: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through particular routes

2005-11-02 Thread Christopher L. Morrow
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: It's just a bad habit, and while you may know exactly what it means and doesn't mean, it does nothing but confuse new people about how and why classless routing works. It is absolutely absurd that so many people still keep them confused, then