Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-07-02 Thread Ruri Hiromi
Hi, here is my experience 3 weeks ago ; I contacted 20 gTLD host masters and only a few host master replied me with negative answer; they have no plan to involve IPv6 for their name servers and coordination of their registrars. (a lot of registrars provide web form to their customers

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-07-01 Thread Andrew Sullivan
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 01:57:04PM -0700, Barrett Lyon wrote: Neustar/Ultra's .org gtld registration services apparently do not As a point of clarification, Neustar Ultra Services has exactly nothing to do with registration of .ORG domain names. That's a function of Public Interest

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-07-01 Thread Mark Andrews
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: I've read your email twice and I dont follow. Either you are telling me a) Provide my own hints with included (you specifically say thats not what you mean tho) or b) Serve my own root zone. From a root operator, surely thats not right either

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-30 Thread James Cloos
Barrett == Barrett Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Barrett Apparently GoDaddy does not support v6 glue for their customers, Barrett who does? I know that gkg.net does. And entering them is via the same web form as v4 addresses. -JimC -- James Cloos [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP:

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-30 Thread Mark Andrews
Barrett Lyon wrote: =20 Apparently GoDaddy does not support v6 glue for their customers, who does? I don't think requiring dual-stack v6 users perform v4 queries t= o find records is all that great. At least eNom does. There are a few others but it tends to be that you have to raise a

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-30 Thread Stephen Wilcox
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 11:16:40PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: Barrett Lyon wrote: =20 Apparently GoDaddy does not support v6 glue for their customers, who does? I don't think requiring dual-stack v6 users perform v4 queries t= o find records is all that great. At least eNom

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-30 Thread Jeroen Massar
Stephen Wilcox wrote: On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 11:16:40PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: [..] You don't change the hints you just provide zones that override B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET, F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET, H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET, K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET and M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET or just use your

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-29 Thread Barrett Lyon
One note here is that even though you can get glue into com/net/org using this method, there is no IPv6 glue for the root yet, as such even if you manage to get the IPv6 glue in, it won't accomplish much (except sending all IPv6 capable resolvers over IPv6 transport :) as all Unless I

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-29 Thread JAKO Andras
;. IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 360 IN A 198.41.0.4 B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 360 IN A 192.228.79.201 C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 360 IN A 192.33.4.12 D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 360 IN A 128.8.10.90

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-29 Thread Edward Lewis
I'm pretty disappointed now, Searching the ICANN web site I found this: http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac018.pdf Does anyone know what's been happening in the wake of that document? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-29 Thread Chris L. Morrow
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Barrett Lyon wrote: If you deploy dual-stack, it is much easier to keep doing the DNS queries using IPv4 transport, and there is not any practical advantage in doing so with IPv6 transport. Thanks Jordi, not to sound too brash but, I'm already doing so. I am

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-29 Thread Edward Lewis
At 9:23 -0700 6/29/07, Barrett Lyon wrote: I would like to support v6 so a native v6 only user can still communicate with my network, dns and all, apparently in practice that is not easy to do, which is somewhat ironic given all of the v6 push lately. It also seems like the roots are not even

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-29 Thread Iljitsch van Beijnum
On 29-jun-2007, at 19:06, Edward Lewis wrote: I'm pretty disappointed now, Searching the ICANN web site I found this: http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac018.pdf Does anyone know what's been happening in the wake of that document? Well: Additional study and testing is

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-29 Thread Barrett Lyon
there are providers that have (in the US even if that matters) ipv6 connected auth servers, that could even help. I can't seem to make one of them want to be a registrar too :( but... maybe Ultra/Neustar could do that for you? Neustar/Ultra's .org gtld registration services apparently do

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-29 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
meetings. And yes ... I'm already working on an ID to explain a bit more all the details. Regards, Jordi De: Barrett Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fecha: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:23:59 -0700 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: nanog@merit.edu Asunto: Re: ICANN registrar

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-29 Thread Perry Lorier
One note here is that even though you can get glue into com/net/org using this method, there is no IPv6 glue for the root yet, as such even if you manage to get the IPv6 glue in, it won't accomplish much (except sending all IPv6 capable resolvers over IPv6 transport :) as all resolvers will

Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

2007-06-29 Thread Chris L. Morrow
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Barrett Lyon wrote: there are providers that have (in the US even if that matters) ipv6 connected auth servers, that could even help. I can't seem to make one of them want to be a registrar too :( but... maybe Ultra/Neustar could do that for you?