On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> It's just a bad habit, and while you may know exactly what it means and
> doesn't mean, it does nothing but confuse new people about how and why
> classless routing works. It is absolutely absurd that so many people still
keep them confused, th
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 03:21:15PM -0800, Joe McGuckin wrote:
>
> RAS,
>
> I have to admit that I'm guilty of using the phrase "class C" more or less
> interchangably with "/24" - I suspect a lot of us still do that...
Well, on behalf of the entire networking community, I hereby ask you to
sto
> I have to admit that I'm guilty of using the phrase "class C"
> more or less interchangably with "/24" - I suspect a lot of us
> still do that...
well, now you can do it for /64s
and class B can be /48s (or is it /56s?)
and class A can be /32s
"we have all been here before" -- csny
except i
RAS,
I have to admit that I'm guilty of using the phrase "class C" more or less
interchangably with "/24" - I suspect a lot of us still do that...
On 11/2/05 2:22 PM, "Richard A Steenbergen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 03:35:07PM -0600, John Dupuy wrote:
>>
>> The
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 03:35:07PM -0600, John Dupuy wrote:
>
> There is nothing about a cable modem that would normally prevent a
> BGP session. Nor do all the intermediate routers need to support BGP
> (multi-hop BGP). However, direct connections are preferred.
>
> Your _real_ challenge is c
To: Edward W. Ray; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through
particular routes
What's the netblock and ASN you already have?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Edward W. Ray
> S
. Ray
-Original Message-
From: Mike Damm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 12:22 PM
To: spam
Subject: Re: FW: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through
particular routes
Let me see if I understand what you are saying...
You have a real network with router
To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through
> particular routes
>
>
>
> spam was a lousy name...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: spam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:44 AM
> To
utbound routing through
> particular routes
>
>
>
> spam was a lousy name...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: spam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:44 AM
> To: 'nanog@merit.edu'
> Subject: FW: Using BGP to force inboun
spam was a lousy name...
-Original Message-
From: spam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 11:44 AM
To: 'nanog@merit.edu'
Subject: FW: Using BGP to force inbound and outbound routing through
particular routes
I recently made a request to get a c
I recently made a request to get a cable modem connection at my home. I
went for one of those $29.95 for three month specials in case I run afoul of
some rules prohibiting what I am going to do. I already have a multi-T1
connection with a Class C block and BGP running on my Cisco 3640 router, an
11 matches
Mail list logo
