If it's a full STM-1, your client might be thinking of POS (packet over
sonet/sdh). This is (were) a very common high bandwidth technology some
years ago.
At least the 7200 do have cheap POS interfaces.
--
Pelle
(sorry about the top-posting, I'm on a mobile device)
Greetings,
I need to get a hold of Yahoo! security and the online submission
form doesn't seem to work for me. Anyone got a good contact?
Thank you.
On 8/10/10 10:00 AM, Leen Besselink wrote:
>
> k...@domain.tld for when you have a personal domain
> key-u...@domain.tld for when you have a server which understand address
> extensions
Actually I think it's user+...@domain.tld for the second one. At least
that's what I've seen for Postfix. Not
On 10/07/2010 04:16 PM, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
> you just give contacts for the passwords with which you have received
> a new one.
>
Hi Sven/others,
This very much sounds like TMDA:
http://tmda.net/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tagged_Message_Delivery_Agent
Where by each person that needs t
- Original Message -
> From: "Bret Clark"
> I've always looked at the nanog list representing issues up to layer 4
> of the OSI model; mostly layer 3/4. Maybe a new mailing list could be
> made called the North American Network Applications Group
> (nanag)...there might be a pun there :).
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Rudasingwa [mailto:peter.rudasin...@altechstream.rw]
> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 1:24 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: P2P link over STM-1
>
> I have clients who want a P2P link over STM-1.
>
> How can I achieve this? What kind of equipment do
As said above, STM-1s are by their very nature point to point links.
You just need an STM-1 interface on your side and another on the customer
side. Which one will depend on the router models you will be using. Also, as
said above, you will need to engage the help of your local Cisco partner for
t
When was email *ever* expected to be real-time? If you need real time, use IM (the clue
is in the "I"), or pick up the phone.
if you simply run the smtpd on port 25 of the little boxy thing with the
blinking lights and the big shiney apple on it on your
desk (which has for most applications
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 07:12:33PM +0200, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> yes, I can confirm that situation is back to normal now after we
> re-enabled the GBLX session. I heared from others that it was again a
> broken LSP problem in GBLX (unconfirmed :) )
Global Crossing recently started deploying Foun
I politely suggest a call into your Cisco account team so they can help you
spec the equipment you require. Otherwise a quick google for Cisco+OC-48 would
help you out tremendously.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rudasingwa [mailto:peter.rudasin...@altechstream.rw]
Sent: Thurs
Am 07.10.2010 18:46, schrieb John van Oppen:
It looked like a broken aggregated Ethernet bundle or something similar...
Most annoying was that the issue moved around a bit, over about five hours all
the broken test IPs we had started working again and then other destinations
started failin
It looked like a broken aggregated Ethernet bundle or something similar...
Most annoying was that the issue moved around a bit, over about five hours all
the broken test IPs we had started working again and then other destinations
started failing.All was well when we turned down gblx.
I know for certain it was gblx, noc confirmed, we saw this to multiple
destinations all with the outbound towards gblx (not just DFN). We are on the
same GBLX pop the sites they are talking about are connected to (westin) and
almost every path I see back to dfn (from seven upstreams in seattle
It seemed from the symptoms OP was seeing, that Qwest was the issue.
Has GLBX reported to you that they are having a fault? If not, perhaps
try tagging your exported routes to GLBX with 8010 as per this:
http://onesc.net/communities/as3549/
On 7 October 2010 16:59, John van Oppen wrote:
> Globa
Would someone from Amazon mind contacting me off-list. I have some
questions on the best way to pass traffic to Flexible Payments Service
(Amazon FPS) and my e-mails to the contacts within peeringdb.com have
gone unanswered.
Cheers
Ryan
>... random traffic (into) their network via our transit link gets black-holed.
So for the same source & destination, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't?
> If i have to wait for 20 minutes for an email, i've started skype
> already.. You know what, why don't we simply turn the smtp servers
> -off- and use skype and msn for everything... saves electricity :P
By that argument, why don't we turn off the Internet and use SMS for everything?
> It may
Global crossing is having major issues (since yesterday actually) in Seattle.
Every path I see to dfn.de is via gblx and Microsoft hosts most of those sites
out of the seattle area so they may be seeing the same issue.
Based on what we can see gblx has a broken port-channel or something simil
On 07/10/2010 13:10, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
You know what, why don't we simply turn the smtp servers -off-
This is an excellent idea. I invite you to do everyone a favour and turn
yours off first.
Nick
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:16:00 -, Sven Olaf Kamphuis said:
> you just give contacts for the passwords with which you have received a
> new one.
>
> each potential person that can send email to your email address, gets a
> unique password from you.
You missed the point. How does perso...@gmai
On Oct 7, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
> in stabbing around today on the ARIN online website I noticed this:
>
> " ARIN provides access to a list of number resources in the database
> which have no valid POC data. A POC handle is marked invalid by ARIN
> staff when the POC has n
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Heath Jones wrote:
Well, anyway, here's three more hijacked blocks that they (AS6517)
are routing. This is in addition to the 75 such blocks I've already
reported. (I guess that makes 78 hijacked blocks for them, in total.)
Out of curiosity, are you also reporting these b
you just give contacts for the passwords with which you have received a
new one.
each potential person that can send email to your email address, gets a
unique password from you.
sending person/maillist 1 gets password abcdefg to send to b...@example.com
(no matter from which email address)
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Heath Jones wrote:
>>> Well, anyway, here's three more hijacked blocks that they (AS6517)
>>> are routing. This is in addition to the 75 such blocks I've already
>>> reported. (I guess that makes 78 hijacked blocks for them, in total.)
>>
>> Out of curiosity, are
As usual for our October meetings, there has been a lot happening,
with more to come over the next few days.
Our annual election was held during NANOG 50, with these results:
- Patrick Gilmore, Robert Seastrom, and Richard Steenbergen
were elected to two-year terms on the NANOG SC (and al
>> Well, anyway, here's three more hijacked blocks that they (AS6517)
>> are routing. This is in addition to the 75 such blocks I've already
>> reported. (I guess that makes 78 hijacked blocks for them, in total.)
>
> Out of curiosity, are you also reporting these blocks to Spamhaus? I expect
>
>>> Seems to be only source-prefix-based, but several ISPs in europe are
>>> affected.
> source: 131.220.0.0/16, 212.201.68.0/22, 212.201.72.0/21,
> destination: 65.122.178.73, 63.228.223.104
> traceroute to 65.122.178.73 (65.122.178.73), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> 1 er-rz-gig-3-3.stw-bonn.de
On 2010/10/06 11:36 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Well, anyway, here's three more hijacked blocks that they (AS6517)
are routing. This is in addition to the 75 such blocks I've already
reported. (I guess that makes 78 hijacked blocks for them, in total.)
Out of curiosity, are you also report
an update:
On 07.10.2010 15:09, Thomas Schmid wrote:
Hi,
On 07.10.2010 14:35, Heath Jones wrote:
Seems to be only source-prefix-based, but several ISPs in europe are
affected.
Can you post source and destination IP's ?
source: 131.220.0.0/16, 212.201.68.0/22, 212.201.72.0/21,
destination: 6
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:10:37 -, Sven Olaf Kamphuis said:
> If what you're asking under point c is "what happens if a system that
> contains such a password for your email address gets compromised" the
> answer is simple, you remove that specific password from your approved
> passwords list
Hi,
On 07.10.2010 14:35, Heath Jones wrote:
Seems to be only source-prefix-based, but several ISPs in europe are affected.
Can you post source and destination IP's ?
source: 131.220.0.0/16, 212.201.68.0/22, 212.201.72.0/21,
destination: 65.122.178.73, 63.228.223.104
traceroute to 65.122.178.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Peter Rudasingwa
wrote:
> I have clients who want a P2P link over STM-1.
>
> How can I achieve this? What kind of equipment do I need.
>
> At the moment I have a cisco 6500 and 7200VXR
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter R.
Aren't STM-1 links, by their very nature, point-to-poi
>Seems to be only source-prefix-based, but several ISPs in europe are affected.
Can you post source and destination IP's ?
Hi,
any known problems with reachability from europe to US? We have
customer complaints that they can't reach US-based sites like microsoft and
others. Seems to be only source-prefix-based, but several ISPs in europe
are affected.
Or is the same problem visible in the states?
Regards,
Thomas
we have run a simular system for a while, the problem is still with
mailinglists and online shops
(by lack of a standardised field the password was put anywhere in the
email, all email not containing a password was rejected with a message to
call sales)
a) you print unique passwords on each
Hi,
Over the last several years I've noticed there seems to be no limit to the
number of proxy/DNS based DDoS protection services springing up all over the
place so I am wondering if anyone has any insights on what sorts of tools, etc
these companies use to provide this service (Open Source, Co
I have clients who want a P2P link over STM-1.
How can I achieve this? What kind of equipment do I need.
At the moment I have a cisco 6500 and 7200VXR
Thanks,
Peter R.
37 matches
Mail list logo
