I ran Zenoss for a network with about 5k - 7k switches/APs, about 100 L3
devices (routers, firewalls), and about 50 servers/appliances without any
polling problems. This was a few years ago on the open source product. With
that said, we were reluctant to expand this to monitor the rest of our
I reloaded their app (yes, I know... sew me) and got this warning:
IP address: 2600:100f:b119:c6bc:bd6f:fabb:ff30:2a3d
Estimated location: Livingston, NJ, US
Which seems pretty bizarre. I'm guessing they must be getting it from
whois or something based on the address block for
On 12/27/12 9:04 AM, mike wrote:
I reloaded their app (yes, I know... sew me) and got this warning:
IP address: 2600:100f:b119:c6bc:bd6f:fabb:ff30:2a3d
Estimated location: Livingston, NJ, US
That's a rather good estimation of where many verizon wireless customers
appear to come from.
Hey NANOG!
I work at a datacenter in southern Colorado that is the upstream bandwidth
provider for several regional ISPs. We have been investigating our
ever-growing bandwidth usage and have found that out of transits
(Level3,Cogent,HE) that Netflix always seems to come in via Hurricane
Electric.
On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:19 , randal k na...@data102.com wrote:
I work at a datacenter in southern Colorado that is the upstream bandwidth
provider for several regional ISPs. We have been investigating our
ever-growing bandwidth usage and have found that out of transits
(Level3,Cogent,HE) that
On 12/27/12 9:25 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 12/27/12 9:04 AM, mike wrote:
I reloaded their app (yes, I know... sew me) and got this warning:
IP address: 2600:100f:b119:c6bc:bd6f:fabb:ff30:2a3d
Estimated location: Livingston, NJ, US
That's a rather good estimation of where many
On 12/27/2012 1:26 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:19 , randal k na...@data102.com wrote:
(We move ~1.4gbps to Netflix, and are thus not a candidate for
peering. And they have no POP close.)
Why don't you ask Netflix? And why not ask them for kit to put on-net?
This can't mean that all of their v6 traffic is backhauled to NJ, right?
Nah, that would be really lame for performance -- I'm pretty sure they
treat V4/V6 equally :-D.
david.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:29 PM, mike m...@mtcc.com wrote:
On 12/27/12 9:25 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 12/27/12 9:04
On 12/27/12 10:29 AM, mike wrote:
On 12/27/12 9:25 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 12/27/12 9:04 AM, mike wrote:
I reloaded their app (yes, I know... sew me) and got this warning:
IP address: 2600:100f:b119:c6bc:bd6f:fabb:ff30:2a3d
Estimated location: Livingston, NJ, US
That's a rather
Hey Patrick,
Thanks for your prompt response. Yes, we are trying to determine where/how
we receive it ... not necessarily influence it, as there isn't so much we
can do there as Netflix' egress policy is theirs and theirs alone
(interestingly, nobody has communities to influence Netflix' AS2906
On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:46 , randal k na...@data102.com wrote:
Thanks for your prompt response. Yes, we are trying to determine where/how we
receive it ... not necessarily influence it, as there isn't so much we can do
there as Netflix' egress policy is theirs and theirs alone (interestingly,
More silliness was pointed out to me. I was looking at Jeff Kell's from:
address and looked up UTC.edu to get your location, forgetting you mentioned
Colorado in your original post.
I'm going to sign off and enjoy the holidays since I clearly am not doing
anyone any good here.
--
TTFN,
Perhaps you could get some subset of RMIX to approach Netflix collectively.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kell [mailto:jeff-k...@utc.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 11:33 AM
To: Patrick W. Gilmore
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Netflix transit preference?
On 12/27/2012 1:26
I'M they would be more then willing to work with you on the open connect
appliance, specifically if you offered to pay for the hardware which I'M
sure would come in a lot cheaper then transport/transit over 12 months.
Carlos Alcantar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
1325 Howard Ave. #604,
Ok, so this might be a little off topic but I am trying to validate something a
vendor is telling me and hoping some people here have expertise in this area...
I am working with a SSL certificate provider. I am trying to purchase a
quantity of wildcard SSL certificates to cover about 60 FQDN's
Yes, some SSL providers (mostly the overpriced ones) like to license
their certs on a per-server basis. If you read the contract language,
this is how it's written. However, this is strictly a contractual
issue, not a technical one. It's just a way to squeeze more money out
of people who
Many vendors do this and I highly recommend someone like Digicert that won't
play the per-machine licensing game with you.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 27, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Blake Pfankuch bl...@pfankuch.me wrote:
Ok, so this might be a little off topic but I am trying to validate something
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Blake Pfankuch bl...@pfankuch.me wrote:
Ok, so this might be a little off topic but I am trying to validate something
a vendor is telling me and hoping some people here have expertise in this
area...
I am working with a SSL certificate provider. I am trying
I did and it was vendor dependent which is why I switched a year and a half ago.
TTFN,
Larry
http://www.linkedin.com/in/llabas
On Dec 27, 2012, at 11:47, Blake Pfankuch bl...@pfankuch.me wrote:
Ok, so this might be a little off topic but I am trying to
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Blake Pfankuch bl...@pfankuch.me wrote:
Vendor is telling me that the Wildcard certificates are licensed
per physical device it is installed on.
If you stay at a $200 hotel, you pay an extra $10 for Internet access.
If you stay at a $40 motel, Internet is
Thanks everyone for the quick responses. Our stuff is currently through
Verisign because of the reliability of the name and the nature of the
industry. Any suggestions for who I should look at to replace them with? I
know I will be saving money, but looking to keep the name reliability as
Steve,
Yep, we are a member of the RMIX already incidentally, and we have an email
in to the maintainer, CoreSite, to see if they can talk to Netflix about
perhaps setting up shop in Denver. Or even about linking the Denver
exchange to the LA or NY exchanges? I'm certain that a LOT of the west
I've found rapidssl wildcards are generally the cheapest (~$120), and
are not limited to a number of servers. In practice, neither are the
other brands.
Ken
On 12/27/2012 1:47 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
Ok, so this might be a little off topic but I am trying to validate something
a vendor is
Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu writes:
On 12/27/2012 1:26 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Dec 27, 2012, at 13:19 , randal k na...@data102.com wrote:
(We move ~1.4gbps to Netflix, and are thus not a candidate for
peering. And they have no POP close.)
Why don't you ask Netflix? And why not ask
On 12/27/12, Blake Pfankuch bl...@pfankuch.me wrote:
It does make no sense, and I would say it is an unusual restriction,
but a CA can put any certificate usage restriction they want in their
policy, and technically, they have likely included a right to audit
and issue out a revokation/CRL for
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Blake Pfankuch bl...@pfankuch.me wrote:
Our stuff is currently through Verisign because of the reliability of the
name and the nature of the industry.
verisign sold this business (like 2+ years ago?), maybe it's time to
find someone else with a reliable name?
Yes the Verisign auth stuff is done by Symantic as of 2010.
-Grant
On Thursday, December 27, 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Blake Pfankuch
bl...@pfankuch.mejavascript:;
wrote:
Our stuff is currently through Verisign because of the reliability of
the name
27 matches
Mail list logo
