Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:44 PM John Curran wrote: > On 13 Aug 2019, at 9:28 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote: > > ... > The last time I looked, RPKI adoption was sitting at around a grand total > of 15% worldwide. Ah yes, here it is... > > https://rpki-monitor.antd.nist.gov/ > > I've asked ma

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

In message <06570278-e1ad-4bb0-a9fc-11a77bed7...@arin.net>, John Curran wrote: >Even so, we at ARIN are in the midst of a Board-directed review of the RPKI >legal framework to see if any improvements can be made vault/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_43/PDF/PPM/curran_rp

Re: RPKI adoption

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:51 PM Hank Nussbacher wrote: > Just like to add kudos to John for being open and responsive on this list > and other lists to numerous issues and questions in regards to ARIN. Not > many CEOs are willing or able to respond as you do. > > Thanks for your time and effort,

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:25 PM John Curran wrote: > On 13 Aug 2019, at 11:03 PM, William Herrin wrote: > I signed no legal agreement either to register my legacy addresses or to do a whois lookup to check someone else's addresses. Just sayin’. > > If you instead used a command line interface (e.

Re: RPKI adoption

On 14/08/2019 06:24, John Curran wrote: When you did that Whois look up at the ARIN website, you did agree to terms of use for the Whois service which contains indemnification provisions and are legally enforceable. If you instead used a

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

On 13/08/2019 22:17, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Just as an observer to your long resource theft postings: - Do you attempt to contact directly the organization or person who have had their resource taken over? - Do they care or are they apathetic? - If the resource owner is no where to be found

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

On 13 Aug 2019, at 11:03 PM, William Herrin mailto:b...@herrin.us>> wrote: On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 PM John Curran mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote: On 13 Aug 2019, at 9:28 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette mailto:r...@tristatelogic.com>> wrote: The last time I looked, RPKI adoption was sitting at aro

Re: RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 PM John Curran wrote: > On 13 Aug 2019, at 9:28 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette > wrote: > > The last time I looked, RPKI adoption was sitting at around a grand total > of 15% worldwide. Ah yes, here it is... > > https://rpki-monitor.antd.nist.gov/ > > I've asked many peo

RPKI adoption (was: Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17)

On 13 Aug 2019, at 9:28 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette mailto:r...@tristatelogic.com>> wrote: ... The last time I looked, RPKI adoption was sitting at around a grand total of 15% worldwide. Ah yes, here it is... https://rpki-monitor.antd.nist.gov/ I've asked many people and many companies why adopti

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

In message , Eric Kuhnke wrote: rfg>> 4) Filing a "fraud request" with ARIN is a serious step and one that rfg>could quite conceivably end up with the party filing such a formal rfg>report being on the business end of lawsuit, just for having filed rfg>such a report. rf

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

I would try to isolate it with something like the RBFTC11 or similar if you can. They’re great boxes, but as with all things lightning you usually can’t protect from everything. I’ve had a lightning hit cause some major issues before at a tower site. You do what you can and keep suitable spar

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

Could you use a transceiver for the 1000Base-T? copper <-> fiber <-> copper that will create an ‘air gap’ on the data circuit. You still run the risk of a lightning strike entering through the transceiver power. You could filter that through a -48VDC power supply, rectifier/inverter pair.

Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?)

On 8/13/19 3:10 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: > With a global company, there's no such thing > as a local natural monopoly in play; how would > you assign oversight to a global entity? Which > "public" would be the ones being protected? > The city of Seattle, WA, where Amazon is > headquartered? The

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

> 4) Filing a "fraud request" with ARIN is a serious step and one that could quite conceivably end up with the party filing such a formal report being on the business end of lawsuit, just for having filed such a report. What makes you think that the sort of persons who w

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

For the record, there are just as many of us that appreciate your verbosity. On 8/13/2019 12:35 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: In message Ross Tajvar wrote: Seems like submitting a fraud request to ARIN is more effective than writin

Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?)

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 4:31 PM Stephen Satchell wrote: > On 8/9/19 4:03 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: > > ...apparently Amazon has become a public utility > > now? > > > > I look forward with bemusement to the PUC > > tariff filings for AWS pricing. ^_^;; > > [...] > > And it wouldn't be the PUC, a

RE: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

The university I worked at used ITW Linx surge arrestors for years, never had any issues. https://www.itwlinx.com/products/surgegate-modular-communications-surge-protectors/cat6-75z The model above will work with POE+, careful of their cheaper CAT5-POE and CAT6-POE models as they are not design

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 04:11:00PM -0400, Ross Tajvar wrote: > Seems like submitting a fraud request to ARIN is more effective than > writing a novel and sending it to NANOG, and doesn't require the latter... But if he didn't fully document his assertion(s), then he would be faced with a plethora

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

In message Ross Tajvar wrote: >Seems like submitting a fraud request to ARIN is more effective than >writing a novel and sending it to NANOG, and doesn't require the latter... As noted in my immediately prior posting, ARIN's careful adjudication of this or any other possible case of fraud coul

Re: Corporate Identity Theft: Azuki, LLC -- AS13389, 216.179.128.0/17

In message , John Curran wrote: >On 9 Aug 2019, at 4:09 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> ... >> Unfortunately, we cannot read too much into this change that was made >> to the block's public-facing WHOIS record. Neither the new WHOIS info >> nor even the old WHOIS info can be used to reliably

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

You will want to check out these. https://mccowntech.wptstaging.space/product-category/surge-protectors/rack-mount-surge-protectors/ They are made to fit into the 1U APC Chassis PRM24. We rely on them heavily in the WISP Market. I've had equipment on a tower that was physically destroyed by l

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

> The correct answer is use fiber. > Not sure I would bring an inter building link in copper onto an expensive > core switch though. Yeah. > Don't know of anything in higher density than "one port”. This on Amazon: https://smile.amazon.com/Protector-Lightning-Suppressor-Protection-TP323/dp/B07

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

You might look at mccowntech.com, they make surge suppressors geared toward the wireless provider market which are pretty good. (not associated, we just use their products). -- Larry Smith lesm...@ecsis.net On Tue August 13 2019 13:22, Javier J wrote: > I'm working with a client site that has be

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

+1 on the Ubiquiti surge protectors specifically designed for PoE gear in mind (other brands like Cambium that are outdoor AP or camera oriented may work equally as well). I would also recommend continuing to isolate and protect as much as possible. For example, connecting your outdoor PoE came

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 19:23, Javier J wrote: > I'm working with a client site that has been hit twice, very close by > lightening. > > I did lots of electrical work/upgrades/grounding but now I want to focus > on protecting Ethernet connections between core switching/other devices > that can't b

Re: Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

This probably won't fully solve your problem, but I run a bunch of Ubiquiti access points and similar -- I suffered a number of lightning related outages, and then started using their TOUGHcable - https://www.ui.com/accessories/toughcable/ (don't forget to also get the special jacks / ends). Since

Protecting 1Gb Ethernet From Lightning Strikes

I'm working with a client site that has been hit twice, very close by lightening. I did lots of electrical work/upgrades/grounding but now I want to focus on protecting Ethernet connections between core switching/other devices that can't be migrated to fiber optic. I was looking for surge protect