Re: DiViNetworks

2020-02-06 Thread Ahmed Borno
How is it technically possible that they reuse unused bandwidth without some funky AS/Route announcement fun?! Anyone can explain that ? ~A On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 8:09 PM Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > I mention in passing also that at the present time, DiViNetworks has > a grand total of some 6,

Re: Equinix LA4

2020-02-06 Thread Saku Ytti
Hey there, > I am looking for 100mbps burstable to 1G (copper preferred) transit in > Equinix LA4 to be used as out of band connectivity. Can do fiber if must. Would Equinix Connect work? https://www.equinix.com/interconnection-services/equinix-connect/ Lot of people in the past have preferred

DiViNetworks

2020-02-06 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
I mention in passing also that at the present time, DiViNetworks has a grand total of some 6,070 unique route objects registered in the RADB data base. Where I come from, that's a lot of routes. https://pastebin.com/raw/YeFBd1qZ I would be gnerally unconcerned if not for the fact that two of

Re: Need NOC/IP admin contact for AS27506/Crown Castle/Sidera

2020-02-06 Thread Brandon Martin
On 2/6/20 8:03 PM, Brandon Martin wrote: An RADB entry for IP range 64.25.104.0/22 was recently entered by Crown Castle Fiber that appears to be in error.  Please contact me off-list to help resolve.  Thank you. CCF claims it's been taken care of. Thanks. -- Brandon Martin

Re: DiviNetworks

2020-02-06 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
Regarding DiviNetworks... I am not personally persuaded that an Israeli company that inserted a route object into the RADB data base to act as a cover for the company's apparent theft of a nice juicy /16 AFRINIC region legacy block that actually belongs to, and belonged to a South African state ow

Need NOC/IP admin contact for AS27506/Crown Castle/Sidera

2020-02-06 Thread Brandon Martin
An RADB entry for IP range 64.25.104.0/22 was recently entered by Crown Castle Fiber that appears to be in error. Please contact me off-list to help resolve. Thank you. -- Brandon Martin

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <24124.30737.599536.809...@gargle.gargle.howl>, Sandra Murphy wrote: >It could measure the extent of the problem and would be within what I >suggested. > >For example if there were only one AS being abused that would make it >a different priority than 1,000 or 10,000 (some seem to be

Re: DiviNetworks

2020-02-06 Thread Tom Beecher
Agreed. I also would be very wary of any traffic that I don’t know about sourcing from my network. The amount of money spent on lawyers when something malicious comes though this ‘sharing’ , and I’m in the jackpot because it sourced from me, is likely going to be many multiples of whatever dollar

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message <24124.27418.388460.814...@gargle.gargle.howl>, Barry Shein wrote: >Given events including the IPv4 runout etc perhaps it's long overdue >that the RIRs should hire a professional big-name (we used to call >them Big 5) accounting firm to audit or at least review IP address, >ASN, etc.

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread Tom Beecher
Reporting the issue is good and I’m sure appreciated by all. I appreciate that those who work in fields tracking down bad actors have a natural tendency to start viewing everything through that same lens, but assuming that every issue is cause by malice or stupidity gets really, really tiring. On

Equinix LA4

2020-02-06 Thread Mehmet Akcin
Hey there I am looking for 100mbps burstable to 1G (copper preferred) transit in Equinix LA4 to be used as out of band connectivity. Can do fiber if must. Please let me know if you can provide this offlist -- Mehmet +1-424-298-1903

Re: DiviNetworks

2020-02-06 Thread William Herrin
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 1:37 PM Mike Fuller via NANOG wrote: > I'd be very cautious about engaging with any company whose business model is > to get a short-term lease of your IP-space. Many companies use IP reputation > data, and so you are essentially lending that reputation to a 3rd party, wh

RE: DiviNetworks

2020-02-06 Thread Nathan Babcock
So interesting thing about Divi. I am a regional WISP operator and we did sign a deal with them and let them use our space. One of the issues we developed while they were active on our network was all of our IP’s started being homed in the UK for google. So anytime a customer would go to goog

Re: DiviNetworks

2020-02-06 Thread Mike Fuller via NANOG
I'd be very cautious about engaging with any company whose business model is to get a short-term lease of your IP-space. Many companies use IP reputation data, and so you are essentially lending that reputation to a 3rd party, who may use it in ways you don't anticipate until the reputation is suf

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread Brendan Carlson
According to ARIN Who-Was they've had this ASN assigned and removed multiple times. Created 11-20-2000 19111 NATURES-BOUN AS19111 NATURE-24 Registration Removed 12-12-2006 Created 01-04-2007 19111 NATURES-BOUN AS19111 NATURE-24 Registration Removed 07-14-2009 Created 07-22-2009 19111 NATURES-BOUN

Re: DiviNetworks

2020-02-06 Thread Damian Menscher via NANOG
They're not sending traffic from their own IPs, right? So they're leasing yours (whether they make that explicit or not). And that carries all the implications/risks Mike mentioned. Damian On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:37 PM Justin Wilson wrote: > They don’t lease your IP space is the thing. > >

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread John Curran
On 5 Feb 2020, at 8:45 PM, Jon Lewis mailto:jle...@lewis.org>> wrote: On Wed, 5 Feb 2020, John Levine wrote: I believe you, but isn't ARIN's list of North American ASNs supposed to be authoritiative? Other than the funky ASN there doesn't seem anything particularly naughty about the site. If

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread John Sweeting
I am replying to the original post as I am only answering John's question below. On 2/5/20, 8:30 PM, "NANOG on behalf of John Levine" wrote: 1800vitamins.org has a web site at 12.180.219.234 which looks like they would sell me vitamins should I or my dog need any. Routeviews

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread thomas brenac via NANOG
+1 I fully agree, not to mention, but probably a bit more tricky to manage, so many resources holder, eg universities or similar, using just a /24 out of a /16, legacy of course  ! Funny enough bumped last week into a computing uni that was in the above exemple...and no IPv6... grrr On 06

Re: DiviNetworks

2020-02-06 Thread Justin Wilson
They don’t lease your IP space is the thing. Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net — https://j2sw.com - All things jsw (AS209109) https://blog.j2sw.com - Podcast and Blog > On Feb 6, 2020, at 2:07 PM, Mike Fuller wrote: > > I'd be very cautious about engaging with any company whose business model is

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread bzs
It could measure the extent of the problem and would be within what I suggested. For example if there were only one AS being abused that would make it a different priority than 1,000 or 10,000 (some seem to be implying a number like that) being abused. Do we have that number? And tracking the

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread Sandra Murphy
> On Feb 6, 2020, at 2:38 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote: > > > It would likely be a lot better than "someone on NANOG noticed a > discrepancy let's shout at each other about it for a few days." Did I miss something? I thought the discrepancy being pointed out was that resources that were not

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread bzs
Given events including the IPv4 runout etc perhaps it's long overdue that the RIRs should hire a professional big-name (we used to call them Big 5) accounting firm to audit or at least review IP address, ASN, etc. allocation. I am not talking about money, I am talking about resource allocation.

Re: new tool: rpki-ov-checker

2020-02-06 Thread Owen DeLong
> On Feb 6, 2020, at 03:35 , Job Snijders wrote: > > Dear ops, > > I wrote a simple tool to figure out what kind of invalid a rpki invalid > is, this can aid people in understanding the impact of "invalid == > reject" routing policies. Only "invalid_unreachable" routes present > an operationa

Re: Disney+ Geolocation issues

2020-02-06 Thread Brian Ellwood
John, Give netad...@disneystreaming.com a shout. > On Feb 6, 2020, at 10:29, John van Oppen wrote: > > Did you happen to have this contact? I have a couple of CIDR blocks still > having this problem. > > The blocks involved all seem right on the main geolocation blocks. > > John > > Fr

Re: Disney+ Geolocation issues

2020-02-06 Thread Josh Luthman
I post this link on this list weekly at least. The past threads have this link. Please search! http://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/ Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:30 AM John van Oppen wrote

RE: Disney+ Geolocation issues

2020-02-06 Thread John van Oppen
Did you happen to have this contact? I have a couple of CIDR blocks still having this problem. The blocks involved all seem right on the main geolocation blocks. John From: NANOG On Behalf Of Cassidy B. Larson Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 3:54 PM To: Michael Crapse Cc: nanog@nanog.org S

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 09:08:35AM +0100, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote: > You would sound much more credible if you'd step down the high horse and > stop insulting the very same people you're supposed to work with. You're concerned with policing his tone instead of dealing with the massive security fa

Re: new tool: rpki-ov-checker

2020-02-06 Thread Job Snijders
Oops, I see a fat typo slipped in - the correct URL is https://github.com/job/rpki-ov-checker :-) Kind regards, Job On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 20:35 Job Snijders wrote: > Dear ops, > > I wrote a simple tool to figure out what kind of invalid a rpki invalid > is, this can aid people in understandin

new tool: rpki-ov-checker

2020-02-06 Thread Job Snijders
Dear ops, I wrote a simple tool to figure out what kind of invalid a rpki invalid is, this can aid people in understanding the impact of "invalid == reject" routing policies. Only "invalid_unreachable" routes present an operational issue in my opinion, IP addresses covered by "notfound" or "valid"

Re: DiviNetworks

2020-02-06 Thread Jeroen Wunnink
We have worked extensively with them in the past, legit company that (at the time) used custom live traffic compression boxes via gre tunnels to squeeze more bandwidth out of (expensive) customer lines. Jeroen Wunnink Sr. Manager - Integration Engineering www.gtt.net

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
In message , Shane Ronan wrote: >It's not clear to me that HE having reserved AS numbers in THEIR routing >table is actually a problem. These AS numbers are actually reserved for >private use. Perhaps they have a customer who wants to do BGP but doesn't >want to register their own AS number and

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread Shane Ronan
It's not clear to me that HE having reserved AS numbers in THEIR routing table is actually a problem. These AS numbers are actually reserved for private use. Perhaps they have a customer who wants to do BGP but doesn't want to register their own AS number and is single-homed to HE. In this case, HE

Re: Tell me about AS19111

2020-02-06 Thread Pierfrancesco Caci
> "Ronald" == Ronald F Guilmette writes: Ronald> Try to think of a word that is the absolute antonym of "hygiene" and Ronald> that's the global routing table. Ronald> This stuff would be funny if only it wasn't so sick and pathetic. Ronald> Even if we forget about all of t