On 2020-11-23, at 08:09, William Herrin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 10:37 PM Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> On 2020-11-20, at 23:18, 6x7 Networks - Lady Benjamin, CEO
>> wrote:
>>> 8tbps (8 terrabits per second).
>> I don’t expect the majority of nanog people to know the intended data rate
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 10:37 PM Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2020-11-20, at 23:18, 6x7 Networks - Lady Benjamin, CEO
> wrote:
> > 8tbps (8 terrabits per second).
> I don’t expect the majority of nanog people to know the intended data rate
> would properly be notated as 8 Tbit/s, but a space
On 2020-11-20, at 23:18, 6x7 Networks - Lady Benjamin, CEO
wrote:
>
> 8tbps (8 terrabits per second).
Competence signaling: technical competence very low.
I don’t expect the majority of nanog people to know the intended data rate
would properly be notated as 8 Tbit/s, but a space after the
> On 22 Nov 2020, at 20:43, J. Hellenthal wrote:
>
> You can supposedly still use 4.5 4.6 on Big Sur if you do the following but
> I have not tested it on Little Snotch, works fine for personal software and
> others ...
>
> codesign -dvvv littlesnitch.package name
> Save the team
Once upon a time, J. Hellenthal said:
> Sad that in some cases the extra WiFi usage results in higher electric bills
> for the consumer and cannot be opted out of.
That's the worst argument against this. Of course you can opt out;
don't use the cable company's box. And adding an extra
On 11/22/20 11:50, J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote:
Sad that in some cases the extra WiFi usage results in higher electric bills
for the consumer and cannot be opted out of.
Power consumption is going to be miniscule, especially if the consumer
opts to use the cable company's built-in
Sad that in some cases the extra WiFi usage results in higher electric bills
for the consumer and cannot be opted out of.
--
J. Hellenthal
The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a
lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> On Nov 22, 2020, at 11:49,
You can supposedly still use 4.5 4.6 on Big Sur if you do the following but I
have not tested it on Little Snotch, works fine for personal software and
others ...
codesign -dvvv littlesnitch.package name
Save the team identifier
Boot into recovery mode
Open terminal and type the following...
On 11/20/20 4:27 PM, Lady Benjamin PD Cannon wrote:
Hi all, we never intended to spam the list, that was a total screw-up on
our part, one I take full responsibility for. A list of exclusions got
included. Please accept my sincere apologies.
...
Again, sorry for including the list in our
> Our key differentiator is that we encrypt our backbone links.
care to give detail of the tech used?
randy
> “Saw the same” after installing yesterday Big Sur and suddenly
> received a notification “this version of little snitch is no longer
> supported by macOS. It’s looks like I have to pay 25€ for a new
> compatible version.
and big slur bypasses it for some nefarious uses, e.g. [un]trustd
i am
> On 22 Nov 2020, at 10:17, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> So after installing Little Snitch and basically denying "trustd" any kind
> of Internet access, I have been seeing reasonably normal jitter with
> Bluetooth enabled.
I actually “saw the same” on Catalina while using little snitch.
“Saw the
It seems that h...@disneyplus.com actually works.
Regards.
El El sáb, 21 nov. 2020 a la(s) 13:52, Mike Hammett
escribió:
> Jeff,
>
> I think this is another example of the disconnect between technical teams
> and support teams at consumer-facing organizations. Consumer-facing support
> often
> How do the cable companies generally deliver this service? A friend
insists it
> piggybacks off the WIFI radios of existing cable company subscribers. In
other
> words, the cable company WIFI router in a flat is providing both a private
link
> for the flat's subscriber, but also a public hotspot
That is how Comcast (in the US) does it. They have a single gateway that
provides the subscriber services and then allows a public hotspot. Various
levels of authentication are used so only “customers” can access via their
login, or truly public. They have different QoS for the “subscriber” and
Rod, that’s exactly how they are delivering it. Unclear wether it’s over a
separately provisioned bandwidth channel, or wether it shares the aggregate
capacity of the HFC.
I tend to agree, as the only hotspot service, customer CPE is generally
inadequate. However it can be a nice supplement,
Hi all, we never intended to spam the list, that was a total screw-up on our
part, one I take full responsibility for. A list of exclusions got included.
Please accept my sincere apologies.
Our key differentiator is that we encrypt our backbone links. All of ‘em. So we
say we’re another
On 11/22/20 12:25, d...@darwincosta.com wrote:
“Saw the same” after installing yesterday Big Sur and suddenly
received a notification “this version of little snitch is no longer
supported by macOS. It’s looks like I have to pay 25€ for a new
compatible version.
My advice would be to keep
So after installing Little Snitch and basically denying "trustd" any
kind of Internet access, I have been seeing reasonably normal jitter
with Bluetooth enabled.
It's not that Bluetooth stops scanning, but it's not scanning as
aggressively. So after a few minutes, there will be very high
19 matches
Mail list logo
