On 5/13/24 05:32, Brandon Martin wrote:
I doubt that's changed given my dealings with them since (which have
been fine, to be clear), but I can't be 100% sure. I suspect they did
at least turn up a few of them given that they went to the trouble of
creating a full-fledged product for it.
On 5/13/24 04:07, Dave Cohen wrote:
My point was that the technology has little to do with the operational
success of the service. Spectrum controllers better enabling providers
to get out of their own way in selling spectrum did not actually
enable the providers* to get out of their own
On 5/12/24 22:11, Dave Cohen wrote:
There are some single-market/regional providers that I'm aware of
currently offering spectrum, but I believe you'll be hard pressed to
find others with national footprints in the US that will. Zayo and Lumen
both did a bit of a will they/won't they with it
There are some single-market/regional providers that I'm aware of currently
offering spectrum, but I believe you'll be hard pressed to find others with
national footprints in the US that will. Zayo and Lumen both did a bit of a
will they/won't they with it for a long time, and my understanding is
My point was that the technology has little to do with the operational
success of the service. Spectrum controllers better enabling providers to
get out of their own way in selling spectrum did not actually enable the
providers* to get out of their own way in selling spectrum. It *should* be
"a limited set of providers willing to sell it, if at all."
I know of one (Windstream) that offers it on a portion of their footprint. I
swore others did, but I couldn't find them. Does anyone know who else in the
NANOG area who does this?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
On 5/13/24 00:11, Dave Cohen wrote:
Mark,
Many/all of these points are fair. My experience is purely terrestrial and
obviously both the capacity and economic calculations are vastly different in
those situations, which I should have called out.
Actually, terrestrial economics are easier
Mark,
Many/all of these points are fair. My experience is purely terrestrial and
obviously both the capacity and economic calculations are vastly different in
those situations, which I should have called out.
However, I don’t think that the optical vendor is really the challenge - I
would
On 5/12/24 20:35, Dave Cohen wrote:
It’s one of those things that makes a lot more sense on paper than in practice.
Not anymore.
The majority of SDM subsea cables built with uncompensated fibre are
using managed spectrum and spectrum sharing as viable business models
for a
On 5/12/24 14:08, Mike Hammett wrote:
What are your experiences with alien waves, managed spectrum, spectrum as a
service, etc?
Your outcomes will vary depending on whether this is deployed for
terrestrial or subsea networks.
Subsea networks don't typically do alien waves, but rather,
It’s one of those things that makes a lot more sense on paper than in practice.
I’ve found it to be operationally difficult from the perspective the provider
and the user, primarily but not solely because any “co-managed” system is going
to lend itself to finger pointing when issues arise. Even
I have found a modem with Positron that'll do up to 8 pair of bonding.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett"
To: "nanog"
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 3:09:07
Some of you have pointed out (onlist and offlist) the importance of the OS to
these concerns. Yes, that makes sense. THe Venn Diagram of hardware that
can\can't and OSes that can\can't.
I'd appreciate some feedback as well on the OS side of things.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent
What are your experiences with alien waves, managed spectrum, spectrum as a
service, etc?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
