Re: Fwd: Interesting problems with using IPv6

2014-09-14 Thread Bruce Pinsky
On 9/14/2014 11:20 AM, Matthew Petach wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Sam Stickland wrote: > >> Slightly off topic, but has there ever been a proposed protocol where hosts >> can register their L2/L3 binding with their connected switch (which could >> then propagate the binding to othe

Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss.

2013-10-11 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Phil Bedard wrote: > I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world > where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines are often used for > upstream links. The topic is policy-based routing, which is being > described as "load bala

Re: Office 365..? how Microsoft handed the NSA access to encrypted messages

2013-07-12 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Baldwin wrote: > While that would secure the connections from snooping if you're mailboxes > are on Office 365 and those mailbox stores do not exits on an encrypted LUN > then a service can easily read the Exchange database; anyone with server > a

Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers

2013-06-10 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > On Jun 10, 2013, at 13:36 , Bruce Pinsky wrote: >> Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > >>>> however, providers a/b at site1 do not send us the two /24s from >>>> site b.. >>> >>

Re: Single AS multiple Dirverse Providers

2013-06-10 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: >> however, providers a/b at site1 do not send us the two /24s from >> site b.. > > This is probably incorrect. > > The providers are almost certainly sending you the prefixes, but your router > is dropping them due to loop

Re: Cisco CAT6500 IOS Simulator

2012-02-23 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -Hammer- wrote: > I'm sure that virtualizing the sup would be possible. But having to come up > with all the line cards would be a nightmare. I'd love for someone Internal > to tell me I'm wrong but until we can get a 3560 or a 3750X on Dynamips I >

Re: Did Internap lose all clue?

2011-10-20 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Darrell Hyde wrote: >> That might have something to do with the fact InterNAP bought both of >> them (and the third company in that space). > > I believe RouteScience was acquired by Avaya in 2004. Did Internap acquire > the IP after the fact? > C

Re: Access and Session Control System?

2011-09-01 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jones, Barry wrote: > > Hello all. I am looking at a variety of systems/methods to provide > (vendor, employee) access into my dmz's. I want to reduce the FW rule > sets and connections to as minimal as possible. And I want the accessing > party to on

Re: SMS Standards

2008-10-16 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Glen Kent wrote: > Hi, > > Apologies in advance since this is off-topic. However, posting in on > nanog since i am confident that we will have some experts who would be > able to guide me here. > > I want to study the standards (RFC equivalent) for s

Re: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency

2008-07-01 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sam Stickland wrote: | Even if they are decrementing TTL inside of their MPLS core, the TTL | expired message still has to traverse the entire MPLS LSP (tunnel), so | the latency reported for each "hop" is in fact the latency of the last | hop in the

nanog@nanog.org

2007-08-08 Thread Bruce Pinsky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Ferguson wrote: > No idea -- maybe just a hiccup? > No, the outage is real and affecting network and systems for internal and external services. - -- = bep -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using G